6:14
Stand firm – imperative, but also carries the feeling of exhortation and encouragement. The opposite is described by James: tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine, half-hearted, unstable
then – logical connection, but this time the logic points in reverse, because Paul is getting ready to enumerate for me how I can stand firm. I.e., what follows explains the previous.
with – 3 “with’s”: belt, breastplate, and shoes; or truth, righteousness, and the gospel of peace. [If anyone ever reads this: I have no intention of exploring the full function of Roman military equipment, except in the most rudimentary fashion. Others much more knowledgeable than I have already done that.]
the belt – I think this item was more than a thin strap to keep my pants from falling down. I picture a broad, thick piece that protected the stomach-abdomen area. Whether that is accurate or not, I need to apply it: How many people can I recall whose double lives suddenly jumped up and punched them in the gut? What kind of nausea did they feel when this happened? God, You know my secrets. You know where truth is lacking and I feel vulnerable. I know that my standing firm comes from our partnership: me doing the possible and You doing the impossible. Right now, I need Your help just to do the possible.
of truth – honesty, integrity, living in private as I appear in public
buckled – securely fastened as opposed to loosely draped. Firmly in place as the bedrock of my armor, ergo the essence of my character. How do I get there?
around – encircling, no part left exposed
your waist – stomach, abdomen, intestines; I feel my emotions revealing themselves in this region. Angry, joyful, conflicted, peaceful, anxious, or trusting: All these emotions run straight to my abdominal region to make their presence known and felt. I need to encircle all those emotions with honesty and integrity.
with – second item
the breastplate – by definition, a covering for the upper torso. I know that popular society ties the heart to the emotion of love (which I reject as an emotion). I do not. I think of the heart as the seat of my will, my intentions, or my motivation. And I really cannot think of any logical explanation for making that connection. But I do. So that sets the backdrop for whatever application comes next:
of righteousness – two sides to righteousness: On one side, God declares me righteous, simply by grace through faith—established fact; I believe it; I no longer question it; that righteousness is securely wrapped around my heart. But there is another side because the Bible uses this term in another sense. I.e., righteousness also refers to my behavior. When I speak of a righteous man, I’m not thinking of his standing with God but of his lifestyle, his behavior. The OT often links this with justice, e.g., Micah’s question: “What does the LORD require of you … but to do justice…?”
So Paul tells me to wrap righteousness around my upper torso, the cardio-pulmonary region. He tells me to let righteousness guard, protect, defend my heart—the center of my will and motives and intentions. This is an important caution for me, one made in the likeness of Jacob and Laban. Was it Kierkegaard who said, “Purity of heart is to will one thing”?
But now another application comes to mind: It is true that God declares me righteous because of the completed work of Christ. It is equally true that God calls me to live a righteous life, characterized by the pure heart that seeks only to honor God
And it is equally true (on the third hand if anyone is counting) that the only truly Righteous One is Jesus Christ. So when I wrap righteousness around my will/motives/intentions, I wrap the Righteous One, Jesus Christ, around me. He guards and defends my will, et al. This does not release me from responsibility. But it does demonstrate the partnership between Jesus Christ and me to guard my heart against any evil intentions.
in place – Wouldn’t it be tragic irony to know all this about righteousness but forget or neglect to apply it? Neglect wrapping Jesus Christ and His righteousness around me? How tragic. And yet there are occasions when I act as if I have left the breastplate behind as I enter the struggles of a new day.
31 March 2010
30 March 2010
Ephesians 6:12-13
6:12
For – reason for preceding is found below
our struggle – my wrestling, difficulty, battle(s), warfare
is not – simple present tense, does not consist of
against – opposition, attackers
flesh and blood – human, physical forces
but – contrast
against the rulers – this starts a list of 4 categories of evil spiritual authority. I think I have to break my rule and consult a commentary or 2 to sort this out. [Next day:] I’m getting some general sense of differentiation between the various terms. One item of interest is that the first 2 terms are also used in 1:21. As I noted there, Paul is trying to address the variety of evil spirits who oppose us.
against the authorities – To my thinking each of these terms refers to an increased level of authority in Satan’s army of evil. So those identified as “authorities” hold sway over “rulers.”
against the powers – The Greek is KOSMOKRATORAS, viz. “KOSMO” = world; “KRATORAS” = rulers. I am very much a novice regarding spiritual warfare. But it seems (from my little reading and more contemplation) that perhaps “rulers” refers to the princes of certain countries (e.g., the “prince” of Persia who opposed God’s messenger in Daniel 10). Then possibly “authorities” would oversee the national spirits; so they would influence events in a region. That leads me to “kosmocrats,” world rulers, which I think becomes self-explanatory.
of this dark world – cannot see where I/we are going, confusion, mishaps, easy growth of evil
and – fourth in the series of powerful evil beings
against the spiritual forces – This is one word in Greek. My Western outlook quickly forgets the non-physical forces that influence me and all around me. I get so wrapped up in the physical processes of living that I often ignore the “spiritual forces,” the non-physical beings at work all around me, and seeking to influence my decisions and actions, and not just mine but the processes of our society and world.
of evil – all that opposes God. Often I assume that evil has to be gross or sensual or cruel or something extreme and obvious like those things. But everything that opposes God is by default evil.
in the heavenly realms – The first 3 terms—rulers, authorities and powers—are connected to this dark physical world. But this final term refers to those who work evil in the heavenly realms. Again, my Western mind set at first wants to ask, “What is that to me?” But the Bible’s perspective is that there remains a vital link between the physical and the non-physical realms of activity. Each influences the other. Animists get this. We sophisticates of modern civilization remain generally ignorant of this interplay.
Perhaps I need to personalize this a bit more: Paul identifies rulers, authorities, powers and spiritual forces against whom we struggle. As I picture it, these beings influence nations, regions, et al. But I cannot forget that there are spirit beings working much closer to home. I don’t know what terms might apply to them. But it makes sense that if a ruler is assigned to a country, then some being under him would be assigned to each state/province in that nation. Others would focus on increasingly narrower segments of the population. It seems sensible that there would be a spirit focusing on my community. Does he have a specialty? How about my home state? How can I cooperate with God in defeating the spirit rulers of my community and state today?
6:13
Therefore – Because my struggle involves mighty spirit beings…. Because these beings operate in an ever-increasing hierarchy of power and evil…. Because their realms affect both the physical world and the heavenly realms…. Because I want and need to take my stand against the devil’s schemes…. As a result of all these, Paul gives me one clear command [post script: actually, after living in 6:18 for a week, I see this a little differently. The instructions to “put on” and “take up” are preparations for the singular command in verse 18, vis-à-vis, “pray.” With that caveat, I continue…]:
put on – clothing, protection, attire, equipment, preparation
the full [NLT: every piece] – don’t leave anything out, protect every part of my being
armor – protection against attack; it must take considerable time for a soldier to put on all his gear. Even today, I would guess, most of his equipment is defensive/protective and a minority portion is for actually attacking and offensive purposes.
of God – belongs to the Almighty, it reflects His nature and character; really we’re talking about being clothed completely with God. But it’s not as simple as that.
so that – for the purpose, with the goal in mind
when – not if; this is a certainty that I will be attacked, not just a possibility
the day of evil – Since Paul uses the definite article, he could refer to the final, climactic conflict that ends all time. But if I spend all my time looking for that ultimate day of evil, I will miss all the days of evil that precede it.
day – particular time, season, period
of evil – opposition to God, the absence of good breeds increasing corruption and calamity
day of evil (redux) – seasons of life, not all my walk with Christ is a struggle. Times of joy, bliss and refreshing. Just as the soldier remains on alert at all times, so must I, because the season of attack will return.
comes – the attack approaches me. It acts the aggressor. But in fact, God’s Kingdom marches on. His Kingdom always takes new territory. So these attacks from God’s enemies originate from a defeated foe.
you – I. This picks up the thought from earlier in the verse: “so that…you”
may be able – not that I have the ability, but God who clothes me completely enables me
to stand – Choose any war scene from any movie (or from real life if you have that memory). I see the hero standing in victory at the end of the battle. The one who is still standing in the field of battle when that day’s conflict stops, he is the victor. Another day of conflict will come. Another time, he will strive and pray to be standing at the close of another battle. But for today, he stands because today he conquered. At the end of the day yesterday, I was sanding victorious, by God’s grace. Today, another battle awaits.
your ground – my assignment. My wife’s cousin has a completely different task, given him by our Commander-in-Chief. I admitted to Jerry that I could never do what he does. I could not stand in that field of battle. He laughed (on line). He loves that arena. God has equipped him for that setting. And God keeps me where He can best employ me. I have been given this little territory to defend, with God’s covering. At the end of today’s battle, I pray I will be standing in victory, with Christ. Tomorrow will be another battle. Today, I am called to stand this ground.
and – this succeeding phrase seems just kind of for emphasis
after – time connector, suggests a cause-and-effect relationship between putting on the full armor of God leading to standing my ground.
you have done – I have responsibility, a function to fill, in this struggle against evil powers. It is not enough for me to put on the armor of God; He leaves things for me to get done—past tense, accomplished, achieved, completed
everything – all that I can with the armor God provides
to stand – 3 times in 2 lines (plus the earlier use in v. 11), Paul uses this word “stand”: firmness, “here I stand, I can do no other, so help me God,” resolve, commitment, make a decision and stick with it; the victor after a contest, wrestling match, stands and raises his hands in victory.
For – reason for preceding is found below
our struggle – my wrestling, difficulty, battle(s), warfare
is not – simple present tense, does not consist of
against – opposition, attackers
flesh and blood – human, physical forces
but – contrast
against the rulers – this starts a list of 4 categories of evil spiritual authority. I think I have to break my rule and consult a commentary or 2 to sort this out. [Next day:] I’m getting some general sense of differentiation between the various terms. One item of interest is that the first 2 terms are also used in 1:21. As I noted there, Paul is trying to address the variety of evil spirits who oppose us.
against the authorities – To my thinking each of these terms refers to an increased level of authority in Satan’s army of evil. So those identified as “authorities” hold sway over “rulers.”
against the powers – The Greek is KOSMOKRATORAS, viz. “KOSMO” = world; “KRATORAS” = rulers. I am very much a novice regarding spiritual warfare. But it seems (from my little reading and more contemplation) that perhaps “rulers” refers to the princes of certain countries (e.g., the “prince” of Persia who opposed God’s messenger in Daniel 10). Then possibly “authorities” would oversee the national spirits; so they would influence events in a region. That leads me to “kosmocrats,” world rulers, which I think becomes self-explanatory.
of this dark world – cannot see where I/we are going, confusion, mishaps, easy growth of evil
and – fourth in the series of powerful evil beings
against the spiritual forces – This is one word in Greek. My Western outlook quickly forgets the non-physical forces that influence me and all around me. I get so wrapped up in the physical processes of living that I often ignore the “spiritual forces,” the non-physical beings at work all around me, and seeking to influence my decisions and actions, and not just mine but the processes of our society and world.
of evil – all that opposes God. Often I assume that evil has to be gross or sensual or cruel or something extreme and obvious like those things. But everything that opposes God is by default evil.
in the heavenly realms – The first 3 terms—rulers, authorities and powers—are connected to this dark physical world. But this final term refers to those who work evil in the heavenly realms. Again, my Western mind set at first wants to ask, “What is that to me?” But the Bible’s perspective is that there remains a vital link between the physical and the non-physical realms of activity. Each influences the other. Animists get this. We sophisticates of modern civilization remain generally ignorant of this interplay.
Perhaps I need to personalize this a bit more: Paul identifies rulers, authorities, powers and spiritual forces against whom we struggle. As I picture it, these beings influence nations, regions, et al. But I cannot forget that there are spirit beings working much closer to home. I don’t know what terms might apply to them. But it makes sense that if a ruler is assigned to a country, then some being under him would be assigned to each state/province in that nation. Others would focus on increasingly narrower segments of the population. It seems sensible that there would be a spirit focusing on my community. Does he have a specialty? How about my home state? How can I cooperate with God in defeating the spirit rulers of my community and state today?
6:13
Therefore – Because my struggle involves mighty spirit beings…. Because these beings operate in an ever-increasing hierarchy of power and evil…. Because their realms affect both the physical world and the heavenly realms…. Because I want and need to take my stand against the devil’s schemes…. As a result of all these, Paul gives me one clear command [post script: actually, after living in 6:18 for a week, I see this a little differently. The instructions to “put on” and “take up” are preparations for the singular command in verse 18, vis-à-vis, “pray.” With that caveat, I continue…]:
put on – clothing, protection, attire, equipment, preparation
the full [NLT: every piece] – don’t leave anything out, protect every part of my being
armor – protection against attack; it must take considerable time for a soldier to put on all his gear. Even today, I would guess, most of his equipment is defensive/protective and a minority portion is for actually attacking and offensive purposes.
of God – belongs to the Almighty, it reflects His nature and character; really we’re talking about being clothed completely with God. But it’s not as simple as that.
so that – for the purpose, with the goal in mind
when – not if; this is a certainty that I will be attacked, not just a possibility
the day of evil – Since Paul uses the definite article, he could refer to the final, climactic conflict that ends all time. But if I spend all my time looking for that ultimate day of evil, I will miss all the days of evil that precede it.
day – particular time, season, period
of evil – opposition to God, the absence of good breeds increasing corruption and calamity
day of evil (redux) – seasons of life, not all my walk with Christ is a struggle. Times of joy, bliss and refreshing. Just as the soldier remains on alert at all times, so must I, because the season of attack will return.
comes – the attack approaches me. It acts the aggressor. But in fact, God’s Kingdom marches on. His Kingdom always takes new territory. So these attacks from God’s enemies originate from a defeated foe.
you – I. This picks up the thought from earlier in the verse: “so that…you”
may be able – not that I have the ability, but God who clothes me completely enables me
to stand – Choose any war scene from any movie (or from real life if you have that memory). I see the hero standing in victory at the end of the battle. The one who is still standing in the field of battle when that day’s conflict stops, he is the victor. Another day of conflict will come. Another time, he will strive and pray to be standing at the close of another battle. But for today, he stands because today he conquered. At the end of the day yesterday, I was sanding victorious, by God’s grace. Today, another battle awaits.
your ground – my assignment. My wife’s cousin has a completely different task, given him by our Commander-in-Chief. I admitted to Jerry that I could never do what he does. I could not stand in that field of battle. He laughed (on line). He loves that arena. God has equipped him for that setting. And God keeps me where He can best employ me. I have been given this little territory to defend, with God’s covering. At the end of today’s battle, I pray I will be standing in victory, with Christ. Tomorrow will be another battle. Today, I am called to stand this ground.
and – this succeeding phrase seems just kind of for emphasis
after – time connector, suggests a cause-and-effect relationship between putting on the full armor of God leading to standing my ground.
you have done – I have responsibility, a function to fill, in this struggle against evil powers. It is not enough for me to put on the armor of God; He leaves things for me to get done—past tense, accomplished, achieved, completed
everything – all that I can with the armor God provides
to stand – 3 times in 2 lines (plus the earlier use in v. 11), Paul uses this word “stand”: firmness, “here I stand, I can do no other, so help me God,” resolve, commitment, make a decision and stick with it; the victor after a contest, wrestling match, stands and raises his hands in victory.
28 March 2010
Ephesians 6:10-11
6:10
Finally – nearing the end
be – continuous condition
strong – powerful, able to lift or move heavy objects, above average physical fitness; obviously preparing to applying this to my spiritual health
in the Lord – transfer above physical attributes into my walk/relationship with Christ, i.e., my spiritual health: (1) Am I powerful as I partner with Christ to combat evil? (2) Am I able to bear heavy burdens? Or do those burdens drag me down and weary me in my spiritual pilgrimage? (3) While not yet perfect, am I above average in spiritual health? Endurance, stress test, appetite, etc.? Am I at least healthier than I was this time last year?
and – companion phrase: strong in 2 aspects…
in his – Christ’s, God’s
mighty power – redundant for re-emphasis, this clarifies that my strength comes from the strength of Christ living in me. It is not a matter of my revving up my will power and determination. Rather, I must continually learn how to employ God’s power for my victory and then apply that into my practice.
6:11
Put on – dress in clothing, attire, covering, protection
the full – all that is offered, everything available to me; or from another direction: it will cover me completely
armor – warfare protection. I am involved in a war. How foolish of me to go about unprotected. Many have commented that most of the items listed below are defensive pieces. Perhaps one reason is because the accuser, the opponent can and does attack from so many different directions.
of God – belonging to the Almighty King of kings; His protection not mine; His weaponry, not mine
so that – with the intended goal or result
you can – I will be able to
take your stand – hold the ground that the Commander has given me to hold. Even my standing is not about me. Even this comes back to Christ and His kingdom. As the kingdom takes more and more of the opponent’s spiritual territory, Jesus Christ my Commanding Officer orders me to hold this outpost against the attacks of our enemy. He expects me to take and keep my stand.
against – resisting, opposing; conquering instead of being conquered
the devil’s – opposer, accuser, father of lies
schemes – I can never out trick him. But the full armor God provides me—when employed, applied and put to use—can protect me and enable me to hold the ground. For me, this is a statement of faith, because I still am learning to wear and employ this armor consistently.
Finally – nearing the end
be – continuous condition
strong – powerful, able to lift or move heavy objects, above average physical fitness; obviously preparing to applying this to my spiritual health
in the Lord – transfer above physical attributes into my walk/relationship with Christ, i.e., my spiritual health: (1) Am I powerful as I partner with Christ to combat evil? (2) Am I able to bear heavy burdens? Or do those burdens drag me down and weary me in my spiritual pilgrimage? (3) While not yet perfect, am I above average in spiritual health? Endurance, stress test, appetite, etc.? Am I at least healthier than I was this time last year?
and – companion phrase: strong in 2 aspects…
in his – Christ’s, God’s
mighty power – redundant for re-emphasis, this clarifies that my strength comes from the strength of Christ living in me. It is not a matter of my revving up my will power and determination. Rather, I must continually learn how to employ God’s power for my victory and then apply that into my practice.
6:11
Put on – dress in clothing, attire, covering, protection
the full – all that is offered, everything available to me; or from another direction: it will cover me completely
armor – warfare protection. I am involved in a war. How foolish of me to go about unprotected. Many have commented that most of the items listed below are defensive pieces. Perhaps one reason is because the accuser, the opponent can and does attack from so many different directions.
of God – belonging to the Almighty King of kings; His protection not mine; His weaponry, not mine
so that – with the intended goal or result
you can – I will be able to
take your stand – hold the ground that the Commander has given me to hold. Even my standing is not about me. Even this comes back to Christ and His kingdom. As the kingdom takes more and more of the opponent’s spiritual territory, Jesus Christ my Commanding Officer orders me to hold this outpost against the attacks of our enemy. He expects me to take and keep my stand.
against – resisting, opposing; conquering instead of being conquered
the devil’s – opposer, accuser, father of lies
schemes – I can never out trick him. But the full armor God provides me—when employed, applied and put to use—can protect me and enable me to hold the ground. For me, this is a statement of faith, because I still am learning to wear and employ this armor consistently.
Ephesians 5:21; 6:9
[NOTE: I started to merge verse 9 with the preceding verses directed to slaves/employees. But I recall a pastor preaching a mini-series aimed at employees, taken from this passage. But he never once addressed the employers/managers/bosses, even though there were many such in his congregation. Being an employee myself, I was displeased. Therefore, as before, I am repeating my thoughts on 5:21, where Paul calls me to submit in all of the following relationships. First was the marriage relationship; then parent/child; now employee/employer, with this entry focusing on the employer/manager/boss/owner.]
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
6:9
And – Paul approaches the conclusion of his 3 illustrations of relationships in which we believers must practice mutual submission
masters – boss, employer, anyone in authority on the job
treat – actions, attitudes, speech and wages
your slaves – employees or underlings. Never having been the boss and rarely being in authority at a work place, I don’t see much to apply to myself when Paul talks about masters. But the principle is the same either way: Treat each other as if the other were Christ Himself.
in the same way – reflects back to verse 7, “as if you were serving the Lord”
Do not – prohibition
threaten them – take advantage of one’s positional authority to scare employees with dire consequences
since you know [NLT: remember] – established in and through Christian teaching and mentoring
that he who is – present tense
both their Master and yours – perhaps one of the best demonstrations that (L)lord, (M)master, and (B)boss all fill the same function. If I am ever in a position of leadership again, I pray You will keep m mindful that the leader demonstrates Christ as I treat those with me as if they are Christ.
is in heaven – present tense, position of ultimate superiority and authority
and – connected to previous
there is no favoritism with him – established in chapter 2, that the walls have been torn down and divided groups have been united into one. Thus, whatever our position in society, as followers of Christ all that has changed. Christ favors neither the boss nor the laborer. He calls us to submit to each other and that essentially means to treat the other as I would treat Christ. For some reason I “have to” throw in this added thought: While God does not show favoritism, He does require justice, mercy, and humility. And to the degree that I violate these latter principles in any of my relationships, I have violated the Christ who lives (or wants to live) in that other person.
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
6:9
And – Paul approaches the conclusion of his 3 illustrations of relationships in which we believers must practice mutual submission
masters – boss, employer, anyone in authority on the job
treat – actions, attitudes, speech and wages
your slaves – employees or underlings. Never having been the boss and rarely being in authority at a work place, I don’t see much to apply to myself when Paul talks about masters. But the principle is the same either way: Treat each other as if the other were Christ Himself.
in the same way – reflects back to verse 7, “as if you were serving the Lord”
Do not – prohibition
threaten them – take advantage of one’s positional authority to scare employees with dire consequences
since you know [NLT: remember] – established in and through Christian teaching and mentoring
that he who is – present tense
both their Master and yours – perhaps one of the best demonstrations that (L)lord, (M)master, and (B)boss all fill the same function. If I am ever in a position of leadership again, I pray You will keep m mindful that the leader demonstrates Christ as I treat those with me as if they are Christ.
is in heaven – present tense, position of ultimate superiority and authority
and – connected to previous
there is no favoritism with him – established in chapter 2, that the walls have been torn down and divided groups have been united into one. Thus, whatever our position in society, as followers of Christ all that has changed. Christ favors neither the boss nor the laborer. He calls us to submit to each other and that essentially means to treat the other as I would treat Christ. For some reason I “have to” throw in this added thought: While God does not show favoritism, He does require justice, mercy, and humility. And to the degree that I violate these latter principles in any of my relationships, I have violated the Christ who lives (or wants to live) in that other person.
27 March 2010
Ephesians 6:7-8
6:7
Serve – supply, provide the other’s needs and/or wants
wholeheartedly – sincerely, gratefully, without resentment, focused on the task at hand instead of distractions
as if – imagine this…
you were serving the Lord – picture Christ sitting where my boss is. If that were Christ in the corner office, how would I behave?
not men – There is a sense in which my physical employment is in fact service to the Lord rather than to men. On the one hand, the others know my claim of following Christ. So how I behave at work reflects on Him. At the same time, this is the task God has placed before me at this time. By doing it well for my earthly master, I am also pleasing my heavenly Master.
6:8
because – reason for the foregoing
you know that – this was part of the common catechism, which is why Paul could assume that they already knew this
the Lord – heavenly Boss, Master
will reward – some branches of modern Christianity have so emphasized free salvation that they have forgotten or neglected that God has a plan of rewards as well. And rewards require some measure of effort or performance. As I teach and as I live, I must keep both principles in balance: Salvation is free; performance brings reward.
everyone – only followers of Christ? Or everyone who does good?
for whatever good he does – I have to leave the previous questions alone and let God take care of that issue. My application is: What good have I done? What good will I do today? What good can I do in the coming days?
whether – conditional connector
he is slave or free – no matter my status in the eyes of society
Serve – supply, provide the other’s needs and/or wants
wholeheartedly – sincerely, gratefully, without resentment, focused on the task at hand instead of distractions
as if – imagine this…
you were serving the Lord – picture Christ sitting where my boss is. If that were Christ in the corner office, how would I behave?
not men – There is a sense in which my physical employment is in fact service to the Lord rather than to men. On the one hand, the others know my claim of following Christ. So how I behave at work reflects on Him. At the same time, this is the task God has placed before me at this time. By doing it well for my earthly master, I am also pleasing my heavenly Master.
6:8
because – reason for the foregoing
you know that – this was part of the common catechism, which is why Paul could assume that they already knew this
the Lord – heavenly Boss, Master
will reward – some branches of modern Christianity have so emphasized free salvation that they have forgotten or neglected that God has a plan of rewards as well. And rewards require some measure of effort or performance. As I teach and as I live, I must keep both principles in balance: Salvation is free; performance brings reward.
everyone – only followers of Christ? Or everyone who does good?
for whatever good he does – I have to leave the previous questions alone and let God take care of that issue. My application is: What good have I done? What good will I do today? What good can I do in the coming days?
whether – conditional connector
he is slave or free – no matter my status in the eyes of society
Ephesians 5:21; 6:5-6
[NOTE: As before, I am repeating my thoughts on 5:21, where Paul calls me to submit in all of the following relationships. First was the marriage relationship; then parent/child; now employee/employer.]
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
6:5
Slaves – Beginning of the third pair of relationships, illustrating what it looks like for believers to practice mutual submission. Slaves: employees of whatever position on the ladder of success
obey – do what I am told, meet the expectations my employer has for an outstanding employee
your – my
earthly masters – as distinct from my heavenly Master. In part, what Paul is leading to is that I should work for this physical, cold-hard-cash employer just as diligently as I would if that were Jesus Christ sitting in that corner office.
with – NIV lists 3 qualities or attitudes that should accompany my obedient service to my earthly master:
respect – honor, deference, give my input but defer to his/her decision, no bad talk or back-talking behind his/her back
and fear – he/she signs my paycheck, has authority to fire me; in the physical sense, my well-being depends on him/her
and with – NIV repeats the preposition ‘with’ presumably because it is in the original. In that case, Paul gives some emphasis to this third attitude:
sincerity of heart – we have all seen our boss walk into a room when we were lazing about. And we suddenly find something to do to look busy while he/she is around. We recognize that as false and Paul says that I as a follower of Christ must not act like that.
just as – comparison, in the same manner as
you would obey – I would seek to exceed the expectations of…
Christ – Promised One, Anointed One. Early in my working career, I heard the admonition that a follower of Christ should save his verbal witnessing for non-work times. When I am on the clock, my best witness comes from diligent, respectful, sincere service to my employer.
6:6
Obey them – Slaves are not the only ones who must obey. In fact, we are all under authority, whether I realize it or not. And most of us have more than one authority to whom we owe obedience and loyalty.
not only to win – avoid ulterior motives
their favor – I find it curious as I review my employment history with this in mind. With no pride or false motives, I can say that loyalty is one of my strongest qualities. So it has never occurred to me to put on a show for my bosses, to try to win their favor. I was loyal; I worked diligently. It made no difference. Some fired me; some wanted me never to leave.
when their eye is on you – I need to apply this to my relationship with Christ. Intellectually, I know that God is always watching. But sometimes I act as if He might not see. But that is becoming increasingly rare. More and more I talk with Him on the trail and in the car. But still I occasionally have a “Romans 7 moment.” Those are becoming rarer and my asking forgiveness is coming more promptly.
but – contrast; instead of the half-hearted service above…
like – in the same manner; or because I am…
slaves – bound, required to do another’s bidding
of Christ – belonging to the Promised, Anointed One
doing the will of God – Paul makes no distinction between obeying God and obeying my earthly master. It appears that he intends for the one to equal the other—obeying my earthly master IS the will of God for me.
from your heart – sincerely, whether being watched or not
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
6:5
Slaves – Beginning of the third pair of relationships, illustrating what it looks like for believers to practice mutual submission. Slaves: employees of whatever position on the ladder of success
obey – do what I am told, meet the expectations my employer has for an outstanding employee
your – my
earthly masters – as distinct from my heavenly Master. In part, what Paul is leading to is that I should work for this physical, cold-hard-cash employer just as diligently as I would if that were Jesus Christ sitting in that corner office.
with – NIV lists 3 qualities or attitudes that should accompany my obedient service to my earthly master:
respect – honor, deference, give my input but defer to his/her decision, no bad talk or back-talking behind his/her back
and fear – he/she signs my paycheck, has authority to fire me; in the physical sense, my well-being depends on him/her
and with – NIV repeats the preposition ‘with’ presumably because it is in the original. In that case, Paul gives some emphasis to this third attitude:
sincerity of heart – we have all seen our boss walk into a room when we were lazing about. And we suddenly find something to do to look busy while he/she is around. We recognize that as false and Paul says that I as a follower of Christ must not act like that.
just as – comparison, in the same manner as
you would obey – I would seek to exceed the expectations of…
Christ – Promised One, Anointed One. Early in my working career, I heard the admonition that a follower of Christ should save his verbal witnessing for non-work times. When I am on the clock, my best witness comes from diligent, respectful, sincere service to my employer.
6:6
Obey them – Slaves are not the only ones who must obey. In fact, we are all under authority, whether I realize it or not. And most of us have more than one authority to whom we owe obedience and loyalty.
not only to win – avoid ulterior motives
their favor – I find it curious as I review my employment history with this in mind. With no pride or false motives, I can say that loyalty is one of my strongest qualities. So it has never occurred to me to put on a show for my bosses, to try to win their favor. I was loyal; I worked diligently. It made no difference. Some fired me; some wanted me never to leave.
when their eye is on you – I need to apply this to my relationship with Christ. Intellectually, I know that God is always watching. But sometimes I act as if He might not see. But that is becoming increasingly rare. More and more I talk with Him on the trail and in the car. But still I occasionally have a “Romans 7 moment.” Those are becoming rarer and my asking forgiveness is coming more promptly.
but – contrast; instead of the half-hearted service above…
like – in the same manner; or because I am…
slaves – bound, required to do another’s bidding
of Christ – belonging to the Promised, Anointed One
doing the will of God – Paul makes no distinction between obeying God and obeying my earthly master. It appears that he intends for the one to equal the other—obeying my earthly master IS the will of God for me.
from your heart – sincerely, whether being watched or not
26 March 2010
Ephesians 5:21; 6:1-4
[NOTE: As before, I am repeating my thoughts on 5:21, where Paul calls me to submit in all of the following relationships. First was the marriage relationship; now parent/child; then employee/employer.]
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
6:1
Children – Second pair of relations in which we live out mutual submission; offspring, younger than I, start out totally dependent
obey – do what you are told, follow instructions
your parents – adults who have authority and responsibility for you
in the Lord [NLT: because you belong to the Lord] – Easy to wiggle out of the command with the NIV, because that puts the burden of proof on my parents to demonstrate (a) that they are in the Lord and (b) that their instructions to me honor the Lord. But the NLT version puts the burden on me: I obey because I belong to the Lord, not because of anything particularly special about my parents. I’m tempted again to start a mini-sermon. Instead, I praise God. Our children went through the same phases as virtually all others in our society experience. If their obedience hung on my faithfulness to the Lord, it would have been a lost cause from very early in their lives. Instead, generally speaking, they honored our Lord Jesus Christ by obeying their parents. The pride I felt then and still enjoy today is purely the result of God’s miraculous work in their lives in spite of my issues.
for – because, logical reason to follow
this – obedience
is right – correct, straight, erect; by extension, doing right honors the Lord
6:2
“Honor your father and mother…” – respect, live in a way to contribute to others speaking well of your parents
“which is … with a promise – benefit tied to honor our parents
6:3
“that – in order that
“it – life events
“may go well – smoothly, minimize hardships, have enough of life’s basic necessities
“with you – in my life, although if I recall originally the context indicates a group ‘you’; so this original promise was intended for the people of God as a group and not so much just for me
“and that – second part of the promise
“you may enjoy – I can find pleasure in…
“long life on the earth” – Original quote in Exodus makes a clearer point that honoring parents—as a group ethos, part of their mores—would result in the Hebrews living in God’s promised land for a long time and living well as a community. Here in this verse, Paul tries to apply that principle on a narrower scale. On one hand, I know exceptions to the rule. On the other hand, the principle remains generally true.
6:4
Fathers – flip side of the second relationship illustrating or applying the command for mutual submission. Fathers = parents, responsible for providing for children the physical, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual elements needed for them to grow to mature, responsible adults.
do not – command
exasperate [NLT: provoke… to anger] – frustrate, irritate, stir up, pique. Some frustration, et al., is unavoidable. This seems to point to intentionality. Now the word that comes to mind is “bully.” I need to feel secure enough in myself that I don’t need to bully my children in repeated attempts to prove my positional authority. Complimenting that is the notion that my children are people of worth in their own right. Their requests and suggestions are not automatically worthless. Rather, they may prove very worthwhile. Exasperating or provoking would immediately dismiss their input to a family discussion. Mutual submission by parents calls on me to encourage my children to contribute their input. This gives value to their ideas and thus imputes worth to the contributor.
your children – mine are in their 30s. But this principle never stops.
instead – contrast; replace the negative above with the positive below...
bring them up – raise them, physically, emotionally, socially, and spiritually
in the training [NLT: discipline] – tutor, mentor, “this is how you do it.” Our home did fairly well on the “do not exasperate” part. But we did not do well in the intentional training. I set an example in daily Bible study. But I never took the proactive approach to intentionally guide them in finding their own preferred method of Bible study and/or quiet time with God. Even now, I am not certain if they do so regularly.
and instruction – I think of training in terms of behavior patterns and positive habits to develop. I think of instruction as information, concepts, and foundational beliefs that I can pass along.
of the Lord – does this prepositional phrase modify both “training” and “instruction”? Or just the latter? I think it could tie in with both. [NIV: “discipline and instruction that comes from the Lord.”] So much that could be said about these terms [training/discipline and instruction] vis-à-vis “of the Lord.” But I keep trying to apply this exercise personally. And the fact is that my children are grown and gone. If I exasperated them, that was long in the past. I will just add the observation that the phrase “of the Lord” sets this discipline and instruction in a completely different category from other disciplines and instructions.
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
6:1
Children – Second pair of relations in which we live out mutual submission; offspring, younger than I, start out totally dependent
obey – do what you are told, follow instructions
your parents – adults who have authority and responsibility for you
in the Lord [NLT: because you belong to the Lord] – Easy to wiggle out of the command with the NIV, because that puts the burden of proof on my parents to demonstrate (a) that they are in the Lord and (b) that their instructions to me honor the Lord. But the NLT version puts the burden on me: I obey because I belong to the Lord, not because of anything particularly special about my parents. I’m tempted again to start a mini-sermon. Instead, I praise God. Our children went through the same phases as virtually all others in our society experience. If their obedience hung on my faithfulness to the Lord, it would have been a lost cause from very early in their lives. Instead, generally speaking, they honored our Lord Jesus Christ by obeying their parents. The pride I felt then and still enjoy today is purely the result of God’s miraculous work in their lives in spite of my issues.
for – because, logical reason to follow
this – obedience
is right – correct, straight, erect; by extension, doing right honors the Lord
6:2
“Honor your father and mother…” – respect, live in a way to contribute to others speaking well of your parents
“which is … with a promise – benefit tied to honor our parents
6:3
“that – in order that
“it – life events
“may go well – smoothly, minimize hardships, have enough of life’s basic necessities
“with you – in my life, although if I recall originally the context indicates a group ‘you’; so this original promise was intended for the people of God as a group and not so much just for me
“and that – second part of the promise
“you may enjoy – I can find pleasure in…
“long life on the earth” – Original quote in Exodus makes a clearer point that honoring parents—as a group ethos, part of their mores—would result in the Hebrews living in God’s promised land for a long time and living well as a community. Here in this verse, Paul tries to apply that principle on a narrower scale. On one hand, I know exceptions to the rule. On the other hand, the principle remains generally true.
6:4
Fathers – flip side of the second relationship illustrating or applying the command for mutual submission. Fathers = parents, responsible for providing for children the physical, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual elements needed for them to grow to mature, responsible adults.
do not – command
exasperate [NLT: provoke… to anger] – frustrate, irritate, stir up, pique. Some frustration, et al., is unavoidable. This seems to point to intentionality. Now the word that comes to mind is “bully.” I need to feel secure enough in myself that I don’t need to bully my children in repeated attempts to prove my positional authority. Complimenting that is the notion that my children are people of worth in their own right. Their requests and suggestions are not automatically worthless. Rather, they may prove very worthwhile. Exasperating or provoking would immediately dismiss their input to a family discussion. Mutual submission by parents calls on me to encourage my children to contribute their input. This gives value to their ideas and thus imputes worth to the contributor.
your children – mine are in their 30s. But this principle never stops.
instead – contrast; replace the negative above with the positive below...
bring them up – raise them, physically, emotionally, socially, and spiritually
in the training [NLT: discipline] – tutor, mentor, “this is how you do it.” Our home did fairly well on the “do not exasperate” part. But we did not do well in the intentional training. I set an example in daily Bible study. But I never took the proactive approach to intentionally guide them in finding their own preferred method of Bible study and/or quiet time with God. Even now, I am not certain if they do so regularly.
and instruction – I think of training in terms of behavior patterns and positive habits to develop. I think of instruction as information, concepts, and foundational beliefs that I can pass along.
of the Lord – does this prepositional phrase modify both “training” and “instruction”? Or just the latter? I think it could tie in with both. [NIV: “discipline and instruction that comes from the Lord.”] So much that could be said about these terms [training/discipline and instruction] vis-à-vis “of the Lord.” But I keep trying to apply this exercise personally. And the fact is that my children are grown and gone. If I exasperated them, that was long in the past. I will just add the observation that the phrase “of the Lord” sets this discipline and instruction in a completely different category from other disciplines and instructions.
25 March 2010
Ephesians 5:31-33
5:31
“For this reason – start of quote from Genesis 2:24. God’s act of bringing our first parents together provides the reason for…
a man will leave his father and mother – go from home; establish some independence
and be united to his wife [NLT: is joined to his wife] – marriage covenant
and – this conjunction is used 3 times in close proximity. The first time simply separates father and mother. But the other 2 indicate a sequence of events: First, I established some identity or independence distinct from my parents. Second, I enter into a covenant with my wife. Third, after those 2 steps then we unite in the flesh.
the two will become one flesh.” – Physical union, intercourse, usually represented in the resulting offspring who are genetically part of each.
5:32
This is a profound – deep, multifaceted
mystery – difficult to understand, not immediately obvious
but – contrast
I am talking about – Does Paul mean that the quote from Genesis refers to God the Son leaving His home to covenant Himself to His bride? Without going too far into theology, I would contend that it only partially applies. Yes, God the Son left His home. But no, He did not establish independence; rather He remained intimately One with the Father and the Holy Spirit.
Christ and the church [ NLT: it is an illustration of the way Christ and the church are one.] – pattern, example for me and Nancy. As Christ gave Himself up for the church, so I need to give myself up for Nancy. Similarly, as the church is to Christ, Paul calls wives to live in the same attitude and behavior toward their husbands.
5:33
However – although talking about Christ and the church, nevertheless…
each one of you – no exceptions
also – in addition to Christ and His bride
must – imperative, demand, insistent; above he said "ought," but here he switches to demand
love – demonstrated value and intimacy
his wife – my precious gift from God, my completer
as – in the same way that
he loves himself – I’m not sure I demonstrate this very well. But certainly I value myself and I’m very intimate with myself.
and – in addition
the wife – she who makes me complete
must – here is the demand again
respect – I don’t know how to define it. But I know it when I see it. Honor, value, significance
her husband – God’s gift to her and the one who makes her complete.
“For this reason – start of quote from Genesis 2:24. God’s act of bringing our first parents together provides the reason for…
a man will leave his father and mother – go from home; establish some independence
and be united to his wife [NLT: is joined to his wife] – marriage covenant
and – this conjunction is used 3 times in close proximity. The first time simply separates father and mother. But the other 2 indicate a sequence of events: First, I established some identity or independence distinct from my parents. Second, I enter into a covenant with my wife. Third, after those 2 steps then we unite in the flesh.
the two will become one flesh.” – Physical union, intercourse, usually represented in the resulting offspring who are genetically part of each.
5:32
This is a profound – deep, multifaceted
mystery – difficult to understand, not immediately obvious
but – contrast
I am talking about – Does Paul mean that the quote from Genesis refers to God the Son leaving His home to covenant Himself to His bride? Without going too far into theology, I would contend that it only partially applies. Yes, God the Son left His home. But no, He did not establish independence; rather He remained intimately One with the Father and the Holy Spirit.
Christ and the church [ NLT: it is an illustration of the way Christ and the church are one.] – pattern, example for me and Nancy. As Christ gave Himself up for the church, so I need to give myself up for Nancy. Similarly, as the church is to Christ, Paul calls wives to live in the same attitude and behavior toward their husbands.
5:33
However – although talking about Christ and the church, nevertheless…
each one of you – no exceptions
also – in addition to Christ and His bride
must – imperative, demand, insistent; above he said "ought," but here he switches to demand
love – demonstrated value and intimacy
his wife – my precious gift from God, my completer
as – in the same way that
he loves himself – I’m not sure I demonstrate this very well. But certainly I value myself and I’m very intimate with myself.
and – in addition
the wife – she who makes me complete
must – here is the demand again
respect – I don’t know how to define it. But I know it when I see it. Honor, value, significance
her husband – God’s gift to her and the one who makes her complete.
Ephesians 5:28-30
5:28
In the same way – parallel truth, or take the truth from the relation above and apply it to the relation below
husbands – submitting leaders
ought – curious that Paul’s instruction to wives appears more direct. No “ought” there but “be to the Lord.” Here however I see obligation instead of command.
to love – let my actions demonstrate how pricelessly precious she is to me; let my actions and words express how deeply she abides in my soul.
their wives – the one who completes me, who makes me whole
as – in the same way
their own bodies – not sure this is the best analogy, considering how I and many other husbands treat our bodies. But what if Paul means something akin to what I just said above: My wife has become so much a part of me that in many ways we have become one—so that what I do to myself, how I treat my body, I am also doing to her.
He who – If I…
loves his wife – demonstrates the priceless treasure she is…
loves himself – that expression of intimate adoration returns, echoes back to me
5:29
After all – This is self-evident
no one ever – generally true, but nowadays at least there are some who seem to hate their own bodies. Still it is generally true.
hated – despised, mistreated, abused, wanted it to go away, wished it never existed
his own body – my physical existence
but – contrast
he feeds – I nourish my body
and cares for it – I tend to any problems that arise in my body. I give my body enough food to keep it functioning, enough exercise and rest to keep some balance.
just as – similar to, in the same way
Christ – Anointed One, Messiah
does the church – He feeds the church and cares for the church. He gives us pastors and teachers to feed us so we can grow and remain healthy. He finds ways to exercise our faith and at other times He allows periods of rest and refreshment. Yes, He does this for me individually; but He also does this for the church.
5:30
for – reason for the above is found below
we – the bride of Christ, the church, the called-out community
are – present tense
members of – belonging to, a part of
his body – the body of Christ
In the same way – parallel truth, or take the truth from the relation above and apply it to the relation below
husbands – submitting leaders
ought – curious that Paul’s instruction to wives appears more direct. No “ought” there but “be to the Lord.” Here however I see obligation instead of command.
to love – let my actions demonstrate how pricelessly precious she is to me; let my actions and words express how deeply she abides in my soul.
their wives – the one who completes me, who makes me whole
as – in the same way
their own bodies – not sure this is the best analogy, considering how I and many other husbands treat our bodies. But what if Paul means something akin to what I just said above: My wife has become so much a part of me that in many ways we have become one—so that what I do to myself, how I treat my body, I am also doing to her.
He who – If I…
loves his wife – demonstrates the priceless treasure she is…
loves himself – that expression of intimate adoration returns, echoes back to me
5:29
After all – This is self-evident
no one ever – generally true, but nowadays at least there are some who seem to hate their own bodies. Still it is generally true.
hated – despised, mistreated, abused, wanted it to go away, wished it never existed
his own body – my physical existence
but – contrast
he feeds – I nourish my body
and cares for it – I tend to any problems that arise in my body. I give my body enough food to keep it functioning, enough exercise and rest to keep some balance.
just as – similar to, in the same way
Christ – Anointed One, Messiah
does the church – He feeds the church and cares for the church. He gives us pastors and teachers to feed us so we can grow and remain healthy. He finds ways to exercise our faith and at other times He allows periods of rest and refreshment. Yes, He does this for me individually; but He also does this for the church.
5:30
for – reason for the above is found below
we – the bride of Christ, the church, the called-out community
are – present tense
members of – belonging to, a part of
his body – the body of Christ
19 March 2010
Ephesians 5:21, 25-27
[NOTE: I have intentionally repeated verse 21 here because the command to submit to one another applies to all the ensuing applications. Unfortunately, our society has distorted the instructions to wives and husbands. So I chose to include this verse before discussion either the exhortation to wives or that to husbands.]
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
5:25
Husbands – tender leaders
NLT inserts “this means” – clarifies that this is how submission will look in a Christian husband
Love – showing preference for the needs and desires of my wife through my actions and attitude. This counterbalances the exhortation to wives. She is urged to submit to—yield to the rights and leadership of—her husband. At the same time, I am told to love her—to act on behalf of her needs and desires. These seem to contradict each other. But in fact they function in a dialectical tension. Each of us seeks the best for the other rather than scheming for my own advantage.
your wives – my wonderful gift from God
just as – another comparison. Previous verse draws on the same imagery: i.e., the relation between Christ and the church (ideally) sets the standard and example for the relation between the husband and wife. Specifically, tis means each seeks the well-being of the other.
Christ loved – surprisingly this is in the past tense; don’t know what if anything is to be made of that detail
the church – aka the bride of Christ
and – His love was not really known as love until he…
gave himself up – I’m tempted to preach here. But in fact, I still struggle with this. How do I give myself up and provide leadership at the same time? There must be something about the way in which Christ gave himself up and still provides loving leadership. There must be a pattern or example for me. At first thought, this phrase seems to refer to his crucifixion. But God the Son gave himself up also by surrendering His rights to be called equal with God (Philippians 2). Perhaps that is the example for me to follow. I can surrender my rights in order to effect the best for my wife.
for her – Christ did not simply surrender His rights. More than that, He did this for His bride. On her behalf, for her benefit
5:26
to – first of 2 intended consequences of Christ giving himself up. By extension, recommended as 2 worthwhile goals for me to seek to effect for my wife, as I give myself up.
make her holy – righteous, godly, clean, set apart, owned by God for His service
cleansing – remove all dirt, scrubbing, scouring, burning or searing a diseased area
her – the church, the bride of Christ. But I have to keep in mind that Paul will apply all of this to my relationship with Nancy: Somehow my giving myself up for her will lead to her being made holy, cleansed…
by – the means of achieving the cleansing and holiness
the washing – scrubbing, bathing
with – agency
water – Is he thinking of baptism? I don’t see any other interpretation
through – means or agency
the word – Scriptural teaching connected to baptism. NLT = “washed by the cleansing of God’s word.” Granted, this omits reference to water which is almost certainly in the Greek. But perhaps Paul was not thinking baptism. Maybe he was thinking that the Word of God would have the effect of bath water in making the bride of Christ holy and clean. Wow! I could go for some time on the power of God’s word to affect change. It has certainly done that in my life. But increasingly—or maybe persistently is a more accurate word—Americans think our puny minds can pass judgment on God’s word. Over the years, His word has gradually been able to bend and mold my stubborn will. The only reason is because He graced me to submit to the authority of God’s word. I do not pass judgment on God’s word; it passes judgment on me. The extent to which a church—local, denominational, national, universal—allows God’s word to pass judgment on us will directly determine the degree to which that portion of the bride of Christ is being made holy, cleansed by the washing through the word.
5:27
and to – Second of 2 intended results of Christ loving the church and giving Himself up for her
present her – A couple thoughts occur: First, the imagery used employs the context of a wedding. In other words, Christ gave himself up so that when He consummates the marriage at the marriage supper of the Lamb, His bride will be holy, cleansed, radiant, etc. But I am already married. It is too late to present my wife on our wedding day in comparably glowing terms (although she was indeed radiant and beautiful and pure!). Still, Paul challenges me to give myself up—not as groom but as husband—in order to facilitate my wife Nancy becoming all that God can make of her.
Second thought: This takes me back to the puzzle I have already mentioned. What is there about my giving up of myself that effects these changes in my wife? And I suppose there is another question lurking inside that one: Why did it not work in my first marriage?
to himself – In every culture I know of there comes a time for some kind of ceremony, which we call marriage. And in those ceremonies, there comes a moment when the groom sees his bride. Assuming his love for her is pure, then as she approaches him, she appears to be the most beautiful creature on earth. Of course, when the mortal groom espies his mortal bride he masses a finite assessment on her beauty. But when the eternal Groom presents his bride to himself, his eternal perspective renders absolute Truth. And He will proclaim her holy, cleansed, and radiant—in fact not opinion.
as – in the appearance of
a radiant – glowing, sparkling, gleaming; a radiant bride glows from within
church – called-out community. Christ is still in the process of making the church holy so that He can present her radiant
without – not having either of these
stain – spot that has not been removed; not referring to stain on our reputation or our history; but no stain, no spot, on the church’s character
or wrinkle – sign of aging; if the church shows no sign of aging, then she has joined Christ in being immortal. Is this what Paul means?
or any other – whatever other fault or imperfection might be imagined
blemish – the church will be perfect. Don’t get me started on how far we have yet to go on that goal. But then, Paul is not talking about the humanly created, social organization called “Christianity.” He is referring to the fellowship of believers that transcends the lines of denomination. But even among this supra-denominational fellowship of believers, this bride has a long way to go before she is free of any fault. Certainly true as long as I am part of this bride.
but – contrast, instead of the negatives—stain, wrinkle, or blemish—this bride is characterized by the positives:
holy – set apart for God’s ownership and use. I can never be called ‘holy’ in my own right; I am only ‘holy’ in relation to God. He along is Holy in character; I am holy as He attaches me to Himself.
and blameless – difference between perfection and blamelessness. The former says we do everything in exactly the right way, never make a mistake or miss the mark. The latter suggests that our performance, our actions, may fall short of our intentions or motives. Christ is creating a bride, the fellowship of believers, set apart from the world, whose only motive is to glorify God in our lifestyle. Still got a ways to go on that one!
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
5:25
Husbands – tender leaders
NLT inserts “this means” – clarifies that this is how submission will look in a Christian husband
Love – showing preference for the needs and desires of my wife through my actions and attitude. This counterbalances the exhortation to wives. She is urged to submit to—yield to the rights and leadership of—her husband. At the same time, I am told to love her—to act on behalf of her needs and desires. These seem to contradict each other. But in fact they function in a dialectical tension. Each of us seeks the best for the other rather than scheming for my own advantage.
your wives – my wonderful gift from God
just as – another comparison. Previous verse draws on the same imagery: i.e., the relation between Christ and the church (ideally) sets the standard and example for the relation between the husband and wife. Specifically, tis means each seeks the well-being of the other.
Christ loved – surprisingly this is in the past tense; don’t know what if anything is to be made of that detail
the church – aka the bride of Christ
and – His love was not really known as love until he…
gave himself up – I’m tempted to preach here. But in fact, I still struggle with this. How do I give myself up and provide leadership at the same time? There must be something about the way in which Christ gave himself up and still provides loving leadership. There must be a pattern or example for me. At first thought, this phrase seems to refer to his crucifixion. But God the Son gave himself up also by surrendering His rights to be called equal with God (Philippians 2). Perhaps that is the example for me to follow. I can surrender my rights in order to effect the best for my wife.
for her – Christ did not simply surrender His rights. More than that, He did this for His bride. On her behalf, for her benefit
5:26
to – first of 2 intended consequences of Christ giving himself up. By extension, recommended as 2 worthwhile goals for me to seek to effect for my wife, as I give myself up.
make her holy – righteous, godly, clean, set apart, owned by God for His service
cleansing – remove all dirt, scrubbing, scouring, burning or searing a diseased area
her – the church, the bride of Christ. But I have to keep in mind that Paul will apply all of this to my relationship with Nancy: Somehow my giving myself up for her will lead to her being made holy, cleansed…
by – the means of achieving the cleansing and holiness
the washing – scrubbing, bathing
with – agency
water – Is he thinking of baptism? I don’t see any other interpretation
through – means or agency
the word – Scriptural teaching connected to baptism. NLT = “washed by the cleansing of God’s word.” Granted, this omits reference to water which is almost certainly in the Greek. But perhaps Paul was not thinking baptism. Maybe he was thinking that the Word of God would have the effect of bath water in making the bride of Christ holy and clean. Wow! I could go for some time on the power of God’s word to affect change. It has certainly done that in my life. But increasingly—or maybe persistently is a more accurate word—Americans think our puny minds can pass judgment on God’s word. Over the years, His word has gradually been able to bend and mold my stubborn will. The only reason is because He graced me to submit to the authority of God’s word. I do not pass judgment on God’s word; it passes judgment on me. The extent to which a church—local, denominational, national, universal—allows God’s word to pass judgment on us will directly determine the degree to which that portion of the bride of Christ is being made holy, cleansed by the washing through the word.
5:27
and to – Second of 2 intended results of Christ loving the church and giving Himself up for her
present her – A couple thoughts occur: First, the imagery used employs the context of a wedding. In other words, Christ gave himself up so that when He consummates the marriage at the marriage supper of the Lamb, His bride will be holy, cleansed, radiant, etc. But I am already married. It is too late to present my wife on our wedding day in comparably glowing terms (although she was indeed radiant and beautiful and pure!). Still, Paul challenges me to give myself up—not as groom but as husband—in order to facilitate my wife Nancy becoming all that God can make of her.
Second thought: This takes me back to the puzzle I have already mentioned. What is there about my giving up of myself that effects these changes in my wife? And I suppose there is another question lurking inside that one: Why did it not work in my first marriage?
to himself – In every culture I know of there comes a time for some kind of ceremony, which we call marriage. And in those ceremonies, there comes a moment when the groom sees his bride. Assuming his love for her is pure, then as she approaches him, she appears to be the most beautiful creature on earth. Of course, when the mortal groom espies his mortal bride he masses a finite assessment on her beauty. But when the eternal Groom presents his bride to himself, his eternal perspective renders absolute Truth. And He will proclaim her holy, cleansed, and radiant—in fact not opinion.
as – in the appearance of
a radiant – glowing, sparkling, gleaming; a radiant bride glows from within
church – called-out community. Christ is still in the process of making the church holy so that He can present her radiant
without – not having either of these
stain – spot that has not been removed; not referring to stain on our reputation or our history; but no stain, no spot, on the church’s character
or wrinkle – sign of aging; if the church shows no sign of aging, then she has joined Christ in being immortal. Is this what Paul means?
or any other – whatever other fault or imperfection might be imagined
blemish – the church will be perfect. Don’t get me started on how far we have yet to go on that goal. But then, Paul is not talking about the humanly created, social organization called “Christianity.” He is referring to the fellowship of believers that transcends the lines of denomination. But even among this supra-denominational fellowship of believers, this bride has a long way to go before she is free of any fault. Certainly true as long as I am part of this bride.
but – contrast, instead of the negatives—stain, wrinkle, or blemish—this bride is characterized by the positives:
holy – set apart for God’s ownership and use. I can never be called ‘holy’ in my own right; I am only ‘holy’ in relation to God. He along is Holy in character; I am holy as He attaches me to Himself.
and blameless – difference between perfection and blamelessness. The former says we do everything in exactly the right way, never make a mistake or miss the mark. The latter suggests that our performance, our actions, may fall short of our intentions or motives. Christ is creating a bride, the fellowship of believers, set apart from the world, whose only motive is to glorify God in our lifestyle. Still got a ways to go on that one!
Ephesians 5:21-24
5:21
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
5:22
Wives – God’s gift to me, the one who makes me complete
submit – This word is not in the Greek. Instead, it simply says “wives to your husbands as to the Lord.” But the effect is the same: release your rights. Wives are told to place their rights after their husbands’ rights, just as they would the rights of Christ. But this is said in the immediate context of all of us Christ-followers submitting to each other. In fact, this actually starts a series of 6 examples in which Paul illustrates how a Christ-follower will live out the principle of mutual submission.
to your husbands – I think this is obvious enough. What occurs to me, however, is this: In each of these illustrations I need to remember that this is not the only relationship in which I need to submit. Paul illustrates with husband-wife relations, employer-employee relations, and parent-child relations. But I have other interactions with other Christ-followers. In those contacts also, I must demonstrate the spirit of submission. (PS: Whether or not the other person practices mutual submission)
as to – in the same way as you would to …
the Lord – the Boss
5:23
For – because; give preference to him because…
the husband is – present tense
the head – This is a term of leadership, not dictatorship nor superiority. I am called to lead while (?), by (?) submitting (see v. 25ff)
of the wife – God’s gift to make me complete
as – in the same way
Christ – the Promised and Anointed One
is – simple present tense
the head – leader, not dictator. To see His leadership style, refer to verses 25-27
of the church – the called-out community. We are supposed to be different, to do community differently, to relate with each other differently. Sadly, this is too often not the case.
his – we, the Christ-followers, belong to Him
body – unity in diversity, working for a common goal
of which he is – still present tense
the Savior – He lifted me out of the miry pit. He has every right to demand and dictate my obedience. Instead, He leads me and us by giving Himself up, surrendering Himself in my stead. Now, I/we are called to follow such a leader. Similarly, wives are called to follow the leadership of their husbands. I choose not to explore all the “what ifs.” I keep trying to make each passage applicable to me. And clearly those “what ifs” do not apply to me.
5:24
Now – Transitional word, leading to an illustration or explanation
as … so also – comparison
the church – called-out community that exists and functions differently than the world at large
submits – giving preference to the rights of another over one’s own rights
to Christ – Promised Anointed One, God in the flesh
wives – God’s gift to make me whole
should submit – exhortation rather than command?! I don’t recall any instances as yet in this letter when Paul recommends a behavior instead of commanding it. For some reason, both here and in v 28, talking to husbands, he recommends this lifestyle. But he stops short of commanding it.
to their husbands – the one God gave them to provide spiritual leadership
in everything – This actually puts a heavy load of responsibility on me as the husband. If my wife submits to me in everything, then I had better make sure I provide wise, godly leadership for her to follow.
Submit – yield, give preference to; this does not suggest a lower value on me as the submitter; rather with my full value intact, I choose to give preference to you, to let go of my rights for the sake of yours.
to one another – two-way street. I submit to you; you submit to me. The trick is in submitting without keeping score. If I keep a running tally of who submitted last time, then I’m not really submitting.
out of – as a result of, evidence of, motive
reverence – respect, recognition of worth. Our submitting to each other somehow reflects on Him. Conversely, my pride or clinging to my rights reflects poorly on Him.
for Christ – the Anointed One
5:22
Wives – God’s gift to me, the one who makes me complete
submit – This word is not in the Greek. Instead, it simply says “wives to your husbands as to the Lord.” But the effect is the same: release your rights. Wives are told to place their rights after their husbands’ rights, just as they would the rights of Christ. But this is said in the immediate context of all of us Christ-followers submitting to each other. In fact, this actually starts a series of 6 examples in which Paul illustrates how a Christ-follower will live out the principle of mutual submission.
to your husbands – I think this is obvious enough. What occurs to me, however, is this: In each of these illustrations I need to remember that this is not the only relationship in which I need to submit. Paul illustrates with husband-wife relations, employer-employee relations, and parent-child relations. But I have other interactions with other Christ-followers. In those contacts also, I must demonstrate the spirit of submission. (PS: Whether or not the other person practices mutual submission)
as to – in the same way as you would to …
the Lord – the Boss
5:23
For – because; give preference to him because…
the husband is – present tense
the head – This is a term of leadership, not dictatorship nor superiority. I am called to lead while (?), by (?) submitting (see v. 25ff)
of the wife – God’s gift to make me complete
as – in the same way
Christ – the Promised and Anointed One
is – simple present tense
the head – leader, not dictator. To see His leadership style, refer to verses 25-27
of the church – the called-out community. We are supposed to be different, to do community differently, to relate with each other differently. Sadly, this is too often not the case.
his – we, the Christ-followers, belong to Him
body – unity in diversity, working for a common goal
of which he is – still present tense
the Savior – He lifted me out of the miry pit. He has every right to demand and dictate my obedience. Instead, He leads me and us by giving Himself up, surrendering Himself in my stead. Now, I/we are called to follow such a leader. Similarly, wives are called to follow the leadership of their husbands. I choose not to explore all the “what ifs.” I keep trying to make each passage applicable to me. And clearly those “what ifs” do not apply to me.
5:24
Now – Transitional word, leading to an illustration or explanation
as … so also – comparison
the church – called-out community that exists and functions differently than the world at large
submits – giving preference to the rights of another over one’s own rights
to Christ – Promised Anointed One, God in the flesh
wives – God’s gift to make me whole
should submit – exhortation rather than command?! I don’t recall any instances as yet in this letter when Paul recommends a behavior instead of commanding it. For some reason, both here and in v 28, talking to husbands, he recommends this lifestyle. But he stops short of commanding it.
to their husbands – the one God gave them to provide spiritual leadership
in everything – This actually puts a heavy load of responsibility on me as the husband. If my wife submits to me in everything, then I had better make sure I provide wise, godly leadership for her to follow.
17 March 2010
Ephesians 5:18-20
5:18
Do not – One more ban that reflects our life in Christ
get drunk – allow a substance to control me, leads to losing judgment, doing foolish things, possibly violent acts, regret the next day
on wine – or any other substance that takes control of me
which leads – consequence
to debauchery [NLT = ruin your life] – def.: “extreme indulgence in sensual pleasures; dissipation.” The only time I drank too much happened in a restricted context where I was not driving. I knew I had come under the influence when I heard myself laughing too loudly at “jokes” that weren’t funny. I stopped drinking alcohol for that night at that point. But, as evidence that one’s judgment becomes impaired, I started contemplating doing things I normally would not consider. Fortunately, those ideas never materialized.
Instead – another instance of replacing the negative with the positive
be filled – the antidote for being controlled by a substance is found in being filled—sated, saturated, absorbed, overflowing…
with the Spirit – I think the imagery is supposed to suggest that I should allow the Spirit to control me. The problem with that is: He will not control me as I understand the word. He will lead, guide, advise, counsel and seek to influence my choices. But that falls short of how I understand control, because ultimately I must make the decisions. That leaves me still in control.
I have heard preachers expound this. Friends extol it, i.e., yielding to the control of the Spirit. I have said those words more times than I recall. I even meant those words sincerely some of those times. But when I opened my eyes and stood from my knees, I still had to make the decisions myself. And, too often, my decisions were not the choices that the Holy spirit would have made—had He been in control.
The other, another, approach to this statement suggests some kind of emotional state that sounds to me like euphoria. Now, I have enjoyed many occasions when the Holy Spirit made His presence known and felt within me. A few of those times could be described as euphoric. I recall a few times when I stood (I think I happened to be standing on each such occasion), I stood with my hands in the air, tears streaming down my face, unable to voice a sound except that of my sobbing for joy.
When I think of “filled with the Spirit,” that is another of the images that come to mind. But I cannot stay there any more than He can rob me of my will. Theoretically these 2 scenarios could be imagined. But given God’s commitment to my free will and given my/our human emotional construct, neither of these conditions can or will last.
Being filled with the Spirit, then, must mean something other than His controlling my choices as well as something other than the euphoria of His intimacy. But what that “other” might be, still eludes me.
5:19
Speak – Let the words of my mouth … be acceptable in Your sight.
To one another – I thought this phrase referred to one-on-one interactions. That’s how I’ve seen similar usage in other passages, in other words, whenever I am talking with anyone. And it probably can apply in that way. But the words that follow here seem to place it in the context of the gathering of believers. Thinking of that setting, I have already addressed the terrible sin we commit at church when we spread rumors, gossip and criticism. Often our conversation rates no better than that in any work site in society. The only improvement is in our avoiding obscenities and swearing. But to counterbalance that, our words can be even more cutting. In the work place, I expect offensive, hurtful words. But stinging speech from my “brother” or “sister” pains all the more because it comes from a family member. If I rate above average by not gossiping, it is mostly because I have been stabbed so many times and so deeply. As I’ve mentioned previously, that has hyper-sensitized me to such speech.
with – list of 3 modes of expression. Curious that Paul says “speak” but he lists musical forms. My mentor has many spiritual songs memorized. Often in our weekly meeting, he will quote one in its entirety for my benefit.
psalms – I suppose this does not have to be a musical expression. But originally the psalms were meant to be sung. In order for me/us to speak with psalms, I have to have hidden them in my heart. I need to immerse myself in the psalms so that they will create, form the foundation of my speech. Perhaps I will go to the Book of Psalms for my next intensive study.
hymns – “O For a Thousand Tongues to Sing,” “Holy, Holy, Holy,” “A Mighty Fortress,” “All Hail the Power of Jesus’ Name,” et al. Definition: “a song or ode in praise or honor of God, a deity, a nation, etc.”
and – of equal importance. Don’t get me started on people who want to restrict the music at church to “the way church is supposed to be.” That is code for “my favorite style” and “the way I grew up.” Paul endorses 3 very different styles of musical expression and exhorts us to use all 3. If he had known of additional modes of worship and praise, Paul would have listed them also.
spiritual songs – Not sure what Paul had in mind here. I connect it with songs that focus more on our personal experience with Christ. E.g., “Victory in Jesus,” “When We All Get to Heaven,” and a wide range of others. These tend to give more emphasis to my/our experience, whereas hymns focus more on who God is and what He has done and his greatness. I also include in this category the myriad praise choruses that have flooded us in recent years. Writing with broad strokes, these generally focus on our feelings rather than God’s achievements.
Sing and make music – seems redundant after the previous, but the next phrase clarifies
in your heart – a merry, joyful heart serves as good medicine. The first half of the verse addresses conversations and interaction with other believers. This second half refers to our “self-talk.” The messages I give myself about God, about myself, about my standing with God, and about the relationship between God and me: All of these topics of “self-talk” should be characterized by the cheerful spirit I sense in the phrase “sing and make music.”
to – directed to? In regard to? At least, with the awareness of…
the Lord – the Boss, the “Captain of the Lord’s army,” etc.
5:20
always – continues the thought from previous; continuously, without end or interruption, through thick and thin
giving thanks – easy to give thanks when special blessings come to me; so the issue comes to a point when trouble and difficulties come. I’ve started hearing an inadequate response to troubles. People often say, “God has a reason” (or something similar). That is not thanksgiving; that is resignation. Paul wants me to give thanks. But how can I give thanks when a church rejects me? Or when a wife leaves me? Or when I get fired? We talked last night with a lady whose granddaughter died suddenly and mysteriously just before her 10th birthday. The lady’s son is still bitter at God. I cannot blame him. How could I give thanks for such things?
This next is not pointed at that father or grandmother. It is for me: Paul—or God through Paul—instructs me to give thanks always. I must train my will to obey. I must learn, practice and cultivate the habit of giving thanks always.
to God the Father – indescribable Light, unimaginable Purity, King of kings and Lord of lords and Boss of bosses. Every good and perfect gift comes down from God the Father of Light, in whom is no variation. For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you a hope and a future.
for everything – So I think back to those rejections. I still do not see much prospering or hope or future that has come from those. But I would have done well—it would have been wise for me and probably beneficial—to give thanks right at that time. God calls me to give thanks to Him even for and even during, always and in everything, the rejection. As to my friend whose granddaughter died: I cannot go there. God has not given me the grace to face that trial. All I can say is that God through Paul makes a blanket statement, instructing all followers of Christ in all times and for all situations to give thanks to God the Father.
in the name – in accordance with the character of
of our Lord – my Boss
Jesus Christ – Anointed/Promised Savior
Do not – One more ban that reflects our life in Christ
get drunk – allow a substance to control me, leads to losing judgment, doing foolish things, possibly violent acts, regret the next day
on wine – or any other substance that takes control of me
which leads – consequence
to debauchery [NLT = ruin your life] – def.: “extreme indulgence in sensual pleasures; dissipation.” The only time I drank too much happened in a restricted context where I was not driving. I knew I had come under the influence when I heard myself laughing too loudly at “jokes” that weren’t funny. I stopped drinking alcohol for that night at that point. But, as evidence that one’s judgment becomes impaired, I started contemplating doing things I normally would not consider. Fortunately, those ideas never materialized.
Instead – another instance of replacing the negative with the positive
be filled – the antidote for being controlled by a substance is found in being filled—sated, saturated, absorbed, overflowing…
with the Spirit – I think the imagery is supposed to suggest that I should allow the Spirit to control me. The problem with that is: He will not control me as I understand the word. He will lead, guide, advise, counsel and seek to influence my choices. But that falls short of how I understand control, because ultimately I must make the decisions. That leaves me still in control.
I have heard preachers expound this. Friends extol it, i.e., yielding to the control of the Spirit. I have said those words more times than I recall. I even meant those words sincerely some of those times. But when I opened my eyes and stood from my knees, I still had to make the decisions myself. And, too often, my decisions were not the choices that the Holy spirit would have made—had He been in control.
The other, another, approach to this statement suggests some kind of emotional state that sounds to me like euphoria. Now, I have enjoyed many occasions when the Holy Spirit made His presence known and felt within me. A few of those times could be described as euphoric. I recall a few times when I stood (I think I happened to be standing on each such occasion), I stood with my hands in the air, tears streaming down my face, unable to voice a sound except that of my sobbing for joy.
When I think of “filled with the Spirit,” that is another of the images that come to mind. But I cannot stay there any more than He can rob me of my will. Theoretically these 2 scenarios could be imagined. But given God’s commitment to my free will and given my/our human emotional construct, neither of these conditions can or will last.
Being filled with the Spirit, then, must mean something other than His controlling my choices as well as something other than the euphoria of His intimacy. But what that “other” might be, still eludes me.
5:19
Speak – Let the words of my mouth … be acceptable in Your sight.
To one another – I thought this phrase referred to one-on-one interactions. That’s how I’ve seen similar usage in other passages, in other words, whenever I am talking with anyone. And it probably can apply in that way. But the words that follow here seem to place it in the context of the gathering of believers. Thinking of that setting, I have already addressed the terrible sin we commit at church when we spread rumors, gossip and criticism. Often our conversation rates no better than that in any work site in society. The only improvement is in our avoiding obscenities and swearing. But to counterbalance that, our words can be even more cutting. In the work place, I expect offensive, hurtful words. But stinging speech from my “brother” or “sister” pains all the more because it comes from a family member. If I rate above average by not gossiping, it is mostly because I have been stabbed so many times and so deeply. As I’ve mentioned previously, that has hyper-sensitized me to such speech.
with – list of 3 modes of expression. Curious that Paul says “speak” but he lists musical forms. My mentor has many spiritual songs memorized. Often in our weekly meeting, he will quote one in its entirety for my benefit.
psalms – I suppose this does not have to be a musical expression. But originally the psalms were meant to be sung. In order for me/us to speak with psalms, I have to have hidden them in my heart. I need to immerse myself in the psalms so that they will create, form the foundation of my speech. Perhaps I will go to the Book of Psalms for my next intensive study.
hymns – “O For a Thousand Tongues to Sing,” “Holy, Holy, Holy,” “A Mighty Fortress,” “All Hail the Power of Jesus’ Name,” et al. Definition: “a song or ode in praise or honor of God, a deity, a nation, etc.”
and – of equal importance. Don’t get me started on people who want to restrict the music at church to “the way church is supposed to be.” That is code for “my favorite style” and “the way I grew up.” Paul endorses 3 very different styles of musical expression and exhorts us to use all 3. If he had known of additional modes of worship and praise, Paul would have listed them also.
spiritual songs – Not sure what Paul had in mind here. I connect it with songs that focus more on our personal experience with Christ. E.g., “Victory in Jesus,” “When We All Get to Heaven,” and a wide range of others. These tend to give more emphasis to my/our experience, whereas hymns focus more on who God is and what He has done and his greatness. I also include in this category the myriad praise choruses that have flooded us in recent years. Writing with broad strokes, these generally focus on our feelings rather than God’s achievements.
Sing and make music – seems redundant after the previous, but the next phrase clarifies
in your heart – a merry, joyful heart serves as good medicine. The first half of the verse addresses conversations and interaction with other believers. This second half refers to our “self-talk.” The messages I give myself about God, about myself, about my standing with God, and about the relationship between God and me: All of these topics of “self-talk” should be characterized by the cheerful spirit I sense in the phrase “sing and make music.”
to – directed to? In regard to? At least, with the awareness of…
the Lord – the Boss, the “Captain of the Lord’s army,” etc.
5:20
always – continues the thought from previous; continuously, without end or interruption, through thick and thin
giving thanks – easy to give thanks when special blessings come to me; so the issue comes to a point when trouble and difficulties come. I’ve started hearing an inadequate response to troubles. People often say, “God has a reason” (or something similar). That is not thanksgiving; that is resignation. Paul wants me to give thanks. But how can I give thanks when a church rejects me? Or when a wife leaves me? Or when I get fired? We talked last night with a lady whose granddaughter died suddenly and mysteriously just before her 10th birthday. The lady’s son is still bitter at God. I cannot blame him. How could I give thanks for such things?
This next is not pointed at that father or grandmother. It is for me: Paul—or God through Paul—instructs me to give thanks always. I must train my will to obey. I must learn, practice and cultivate the habit of giving thanks always.
to God the Father – indescribable Light, unimaginable Purity, King of kings and Lord of lords and Boss of bosses. Every good and perfect gift comes down from God the Father of Light, in whom is no variation. For I know the plans I have for you, declares the LORD, plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you a hope and a future.
for everything – So I think back to those rejections. I still do not see much prospering or hope or future that has come from those. But I would have done well—it would have been wise for me and probably beneficial—to give thanks right at that time. God calls me to give thanks to Him even for and even during, always and in everything, the rejection. As to my friend whose granddaughter died: I cannot go there. God has not given me the grace to face that trial. All I can say is that God through Paul makes a blanket statement, instructing all followers of Christ in all times and for all situations to give thanks to God the Father.
in the name – in accordance with the character of
of our Lord – my Boss
Jesus Christ – Anointed/Promised Savior
15 March 2010
Ephesians 5:15-17
5:15
Be very – extra, beyond normal bounds
careful – watching out, alert, paying attention, look for warning signs of danger
then – therefore. Because I am light and because I want the Light to keep shining in and through me, therefore …
how you live – lifestyle, thought patterns, habits, routines. It takes much concerted effort to break out of a rut, a routine. God of Light, help me.
not … but – short contrast between opposite alternatives
as unwise – First alternative: not paying attention, following the crowd or following my own routine, my rut. Oblivious to dangers, warning signs, of ultimate result of this routing. Living for today. This is folly.
as wise – Second option: paying attention, mindful of tomorrow’s consequences or benefits for today’s actions. Aware of God’s presence in all my choices and behavior.
5:16
making – energy, effort, personal investment; the increase of good is not exclusively God’s responsibility. I must invest in this project as well.
the most – maximizing, get all I can
of every – don’t be lazy, keep focused, don’t miss a single …
opportunity – sounds like a training course for a sales job. Always go for a sale. Close the deal. What opportunity(ies) does Paul have in mind? Doing good, advancing the Kingdom, shining God’s light. I guess this third thought fits the context best, although the first two could be connected.
because – reason for maximizing opportunities
the days – this present period of time
are – present tense; still true today
evil – darkness, secrecy, harming others, using others, self-centered “using people and loving things”
5:17
Therefore – as a result of: (1) Light exposing disobedience, and (2) The prevalence of evil…
do not be – warning against, instruction to avoid
foolish – acting in a way I will regret tomorrow; live to have fun now with no thought of the consequences
but – contrast, replace “foolish” with…
understand – be aware, pay attention to what is happening and what will or could happen, ask the hard “why” questions, seek God’s perspective on the evil and the light
what the Lord’s will is – What does the Boss want done? Many believers like to use the phrase, “Lord, have Your will.” This sounds very spiritual and they defend the practice by quoting Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, “Not my will, but Thine be done.” At least two problems with that appear:
First, that statement of submission came at the end of the prayer. Jesus had already wrestled with the Father over the pending crisis. In contrast, many today simply list a problem and immediately say (in effect) “have your will.”
The second problem was suggested in the first: Jesus wrestled, contended with the Father, seeking a different solution to the problem of the sins of the world. This is consistent with His entire ministry. Daily—even hourly—He consulted with God the Father to sense what the Father was doing. Then He acted accordingly.
If my boss called me to his office and mentioned a certain problem in the company, what would I do? Would I just say, “Well, boss, whatever you want to do is okay with me. Just have your will, boss.” No. He and I are meeting to exchange views and discuss solutions. Obviously, as the boss, he has the final say. But I, as part of the team, can influence his decision.
I contend that we act most like Jesus and most like the great servants of God when first, we seek to understand God’s will. Then second we venture suggested solutions. And finally when we submit to His decision. But jumping immediately to the last step: (1) short circuits the process; (2) constitutes false submission; and (3) robs both God and me of the intimate relationship He wants and I need.
Be very – extra, beyond normal bounds
careful – watching out, alert, paying attention, look for warning signs of danger
then – therefore. Because I am light and because I want the Light to keep shining in and through me, therefore …
how you live – lifestyle, thought patterns, habits, routines. It takes much concerted effort to break out of a rut, a routine. God of Light, help me.
not … but – short contrast between opposite alternatives
as unwise – First alternative: not paying attention, following the crowd or following my own routine, my rut. Oblivious to dangers, warning signs, of ultimate result of this routing. Living for today. This is folly.
as wise – Second option: paying attention, mindful of tomorrow’s consequences or benefits for today’s actions. Aware of God’s presence in all my choices and behavior.
5:16
making – energy, effort, personal investment; the increase of good is not exclusively God’s responsibility. I must invest in this project as well.
the most – maximizing, get all I can
of every – don’t be lazy, keep focused, don’t miss a single …
opportunity – sounds like a training course for a sales job. Always go for a sale. Close the deal. What opportunity(ies) does Paul have in mind? Doing good, advancing the Kingdom, shining God’s light. I guess this third thought fits the context best, although the first two could be connected.
because – reason for maximizing opportunities
the days – this present period of time
are – present tense; still true today
evil – darkness, secrecy, harming others, using others, self-centered “using people and loving things”
5:17
Therefore – as a result of: (1) Light exposing disobedience, and (2) The prevalence of evil…
do not be – warning against, instruction to avoid
foolish – acting in a way I will regret tomorrow; live to have fun now with no thought of the consequences
but – contrast, replace “foolish” with…
understand – be aware, pay attention to what is happening and what will or could happen, ask the hard “why” questions, seek God’s perspective on the evil and the light
what the Lord’s will is – What does the Boss want done? Many believers like to use the phrase, “Lord, have Your will.” This sounds very spiritual and they defend the practice by quoting Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, “Not my will, but Thine be done.” At least two problems with that appear:
First, that statement of submission came at the end of the prayer. Jesus had already wrestled with the Father over the pending crisis. In contrast, many today simply list a problem and immediately say (in effect) “have your will.”
The second problem was suggested in the first: Jesus wrestled, contended with the Father, seeking a different solution to the problem of the sins of the world. This is consistent with His entire ministry. Daily—even hourly—He consulted with God the Father to sense what the Father was doing. Then He acted accordingly.
If my boss called me to his office and mentioned a certain problem in the company, what would I do? Would I just say, “Well, boss, whatever you want to do is okay with me. Just have your will, boss.” No. He and I are meeting to exchange views and discuss solutions. Obviously, as the boss, he has the final say. But I, as part of the team, can influence his decision.
I contend that we act most like Jesus and most like the great servants of God when first, we seek to understand God’s will. Then second we venture suggested solutions. And finally when we submit to His decision. But jumping immediately to the last step: (1) short circuits the process; (2) constitutes false submission; and (3) robs both God and me of the intimate relationship He wants and I need.
Ephesians 5:13-14
5:13
But – contrast to secret
everything – no exceptions
exposed – revealed, cf. above
by the light – truth, openness, transparency; comes looking for, searching out and exposing the secrets. Light is the active agent in this construction. We do not bring the secrets to the light, but the light exposes them.
becomes – changes status
visible – seen, obvious, openly known
5:14
for – because, reason
it is light – sunbeams, candles, lamps, light bulbs, head lamps, lasers, spotlights; this phrase uses a truism to make a good point about openness and transparency in our relationships with God and people
that makes … visible – causes/enables to be seen. Dirt, dust and cobwebs hide until a light shines on them
everything – strong enough light, shining in enough areas of my life, will expose, bring into the open, all the secrets I protect.
This is why – explanatory reason
it is said – citing another source. NLT footnote suggests, “This quotation may be a portion of an early church liturgy. It also appears to be loosely based on Isaiah 26:19 and 60:1.”
“Wake up – become aware, pay attention, come out of dreamland regain consciousness
O sleeper – life goes on while I remain unaware. If I remain asleep when it is time to awaken, that is called sloth.
rise – come up, stir, revitalize
from the dead – insensate. The dead people are those who are beyond hope. This calls me to leave the hopeless crowd. While God initiates my redemption, clearly I have a role, a part, in the events, by the choices I make. I can choose to remain asleep, opt to remain with the hopeless who are insensitive to God’s call. Or I can awaken and rise.
and – in response to my awakening and rising…
Christ – the Promised, Anointed One
will shine – cause His light to focus…
on you – on me. The light of Christ will reveal—and by extension remove and cleanse—the dust and cobwebs I try to hide.
But – contrast to secret
everything – no exceptions
exposed – revealed, cf. above
by the light – truth, openness, transparency; comes looking for, searching out and exposing the secrets. Light is the active agent in this construction. We do not bring the secrets to the light, but the light exposes them.
becomes – changes status
visible – seen, obvious, openly known
5:14
for – because, reason
it is light – sunbeams, candles, lamps, light bulbs, head lamps, lasers, spotlights; this phrase uses a truism to make a good point about openness and transparency in our relationships with God and people
that makes … visible – causes/enables to be seen. Dirt, dust and cobwebs hide until a light shines on them
everything – strong enough light, shining in enough areas of my life, will expose, bring into the open, all the secrets I protect.
This is why – explanatory reason
it is said – citing another source. NLT footnote suggests, “This quotation may be a portion of an early church liturgy. It also appears to be loosely based on Isaiah 26:19 and 60:1.”
“Wake up – become aware, pay attention, come out of dreamland regain consciousness
O sleeper – life goes on while I remain unaware. If I remain asleep when it is time to awaken, that is called sloth.
rise – come up, stir, revitalize
from the dead – insensate. The dead people are those who are beyond hope. This calls me to leave the hopeless crowd. While God initiates my redemption, clearly I have a role, a part, in the events, by the choices I make. I can choose to remain asleep, opt to remain with the hopeless who are insensitive to God’s call. Or I can awaken and rise.
and – in response to my awakening and rising…
Christ – the Promised, Anointed One
will shine – cause His light to focus…
on you – on me. The light of Christ will reveal—and by extension remove and cleanse—the dust and cobwebs I try to hide.
Ephesians 5:11-12
5:11(Jan 1, 2010)[No particular reason; but in my notes, I observed that this was the date for this entry.]
Have – start of another command, instruction. Does this continue the list started in v. 8? Or does it answer what it means to find out what pleases the Lord? Either way, Paul gives another example of leaving darkness and being light (v. 8)
Have nothing to do with – completely avoid, don’t come close, don’t even watch (as on TV in my case)
the fruitless – pointless, no benefit, futile, empty, waste of time
deeds – activity, energy; investing time, thought and involvement
of darkness – “Men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.” Darkness: obscure, hidden, secret. How many “fruitless deeds of darkness” do I participate in vicariously by watching them on TV? How much adultery and immorality do I condone through the TV programs I watch? What does God want me to do about that this new year? Today?
but rather – strong contrast, instead of silently watching and thereby tacitly approving and vicariously participating…
expose – shine light upon, bring into the open, draw attention to, reveal, name names
them – the fruitless deeds of darkness; and their "doers"?
5:12
For – reason for avoiding and exposing
it is shameful – embarrassing, humiliating, disgraceful, stain on my character, loss of face
even to mention – just talking about it, much less watching it performed on the tube
what – fruitless deeds of darkness
the disobedient – the dichotomy has switched from “Jew versus Gentile.” It is now between “the disobedient versus the obedient.” Disobedient: Those who choose to make their own rules, who do not follow the Boss/Lord.
do – “sow a deed, reap a habit; sow a habit, reap a lifestyle; so a lifestyle, reap a destiny.”
in secret – hidden from public view; but not hidden from God. [Added, Jan 26: I really need to work on my secret life. Lord keep me sensitive to Your presence and how my secrecy hurts You.]
Have – start of another command, instruction. Does this continue the list started in v. 8? Or does it answer what it means to find out what pleases the Lord? Either way, Paul gives another example of leaving darkness and being light (v. 8)
Have nothing to do with – completely avoid, don’t come close, don’t even watch (as on TV in my case)
the fruitless – pointless, no benefit, futile, empty, waste of time
deeds – activity, energy; investing time, thought and involvement
of darkness – “Men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.” Darkness: obscure, hidden, secret. How many “fruitless deeds of darkness” do I participate in vicariously by watching them on TV? How much adultery and immorality do I condone through the TV programs I watch? What does God want me to do about that this new year? Today?
but rather – strong contrast, instead of silently watching and thereby tacitly approving and vicariously participating…
expose – shine light upon, bring into the open, draw attention to, reveal, name names
them – the fruitless deeds of darkness; and their "doers"?
5:12
For – reason for avoiding and exposing
it is shameful – embarrassing, humiliating, disgraceful, stain on my character, loss of face
even to mention – just talking about it, much less watching it performed on the tube
what – fruitless deeds of darkness
the disobedient – the dichotomy has switched from “Jew versus Gentile.” It is now between “the disobedient versus the obedient.” Disobedient: Those who choose to make their own rules, who do not follow the Boss/Lord.
do – “sow a deed, reap a habit; sow a habit, reap a lifestyle; so a lifestyle, reap a destiny.”
in secret – hidden from public view; but not hidden from God. [Added, Jan 26: I really need to work on my secret life. Lord keep me sensitive to Your presence and how my secrecy hurts You.]
13 March 2010
Ephesians 5:8-10
5:8
For – reason for not partnering
you – I/we
were once – in the past, former condition that has since been changed
darkness – not simply “in” darkness; but I “was” darkness: obscurity, hiddenness, secrecy. Darkness provides a cover for evil deeds. Darkness is the time and place when/where evil more often occurs.
but now – that was then, this is now; contrast, change
you – I/we
are – present tense, current state of being
light – again, interestingly, not “in” light, but I “am” light: openness, clarity, honesty. Light enables us to see clearly, makes evil more difficult. If/since I am light, then to a degree I enable others to see the pitfalls in their lives.
in the Lord – Absolutely essential to clarify that any degree to which I am light comes as a result of being, living “in the Lord.” Elsewhere, NT talks about us being or walking in the light. Here, the imagery is slightly different. But the light that is me/us still depends on Jesus Christ as its source.
Live – command, imperative
as – in the style of
children of light – cf. above for “light.” Children of: Begotten by, carrying the nature of, practicing the lifestyle of the “Light” family.
5:9
(for – because, practice the lifestyle of light in order to enjoy its fruit
the fruit – harvest, benefit, result, outcome
of the light – openness, clarity, honesty
consists in – involves
all – adjective applying to all three qualities that follow; to all three I am called to exhibit a full measure of...
goodness – [from dictionary.com] moral excellence, virtue; kindness, generosity. Synonyms: integrity, honesty
righteousness – [ibid.] cf. righteous: Morally upright, without guilt or sin; in accordance [in line] with virtue or morality. Synonyms: blameless, above suspicion, clean, faultless, innocent, unblemished, virtuous
and truth) - [ibid.] conformity with fact or reality; state or character of being true; honesty, integrity, truthfulness
These are terms we use freely, especially those of us in religious circles. We/I tend to think of them almost as synonyms. And they certainly are intertwined; if I exhibit one, I will probably exhibit all 3. So I ask myself, “How do I score on these qualities?” At first, I try to grade myself on a curve—in comparison with other people and other Christians I know. Quickly I remember, God does not grade on a curve. We are all called to measure up to the full stature of Christ. When I lay the goodness, righteousness and truth of my life alongside that of Jesus Christ, I feel a mix of emotions: I feel grateful that He has brought me as far as He has. At the same time, I feel concern and disquietude that I still have so far to grow in each of these qualities.
5:10
and – continues with second half of the command that arises from my now being “light in the Lord.” Because I am “light in the Lord,” (1) live as a child of light … and (2) find out…
find out – learn, explore, discover
what pleases – makes Him happy, brings pleasure, satisfies
the Lord – the Boss, Master
For – reason for not partnering
you – I/we
were once – in the past, former condition that has since been changed
darkness – not simply “in” darkness; but I “was” darkness: obscurity, hiddenness, secrecy. Darkness provides a cover for evil deeds. Darkness is the time and place when/where evil more often occurs.
but now – that was then, this is now; contrast, change
you – I/we
are – present tense, current state of being
light – again, interestingly, not “in” light, but I “am” light: openness, clarity, honesty. Light enables us to see clearly, makes evil more difficult. If/since I am light, then to a degree I enable others to see the pitfalls in their lives.
in the Lord – Absolutely essential to clarify that any degree to which I am light comes as a result of being, living “in the Lord.” Elsewhere, NT talks about us being or walking in the light. Here, the imagery is slightly different. But the light that is me/us still depends on Jesus Christ as its source.
Live – command, imperative
as – in the style of
children of light – cf. above for “light.” Children of: Begotten by, carrying the nature of, practicing the lifestyle of the “Light” family.
5:9
(for – because, practice the lifestyle of light in order to enjoy its fruit
the fruit – harvest, benefit, result, outcome
of the light – openness, clarity, honesty
consists in – involves
all – adjective applying to all three qualities that follow; to all three I am called to exhibit a full measure of...
goodness – [from dictionary.com] moral excellence, virtue; kindness, generosity. Synonyms: integrity, honesty
righteousness – [ibid.] cf. righteous: Morally upright, without guilt or sin; in accordance [in line] with virtue or morality. Synonyms: blameless, above suspicion, clean, faultless, innocent, unblemished, virtuous
and truth) - [ibid.] conformity with fact or reality; state or character of being true; honesty, integrity, truthfulness
These are terms we use freely, especially those of us in religious circles. We/I tend to think of them almost as synonyms. And they certainly are intertwined; if I exhibit one, I will probably exhibit all 3. So I ask myself, “How do I score on these qualities?” At first, I try to grade myself on a curve—in comparison with other people and other Christians I know. Quickly I remember, God does not grade on a curve. We are all called to measure up to the full stature of Christ. When I lay the goodness, righteousness and truth of my life alongside that of Jesus Christ, I feel a mix of emotions: I feel grateful that He has brought me as far as He has. At the same time, I feel concern and disquietude that I still have so far to grow in each of these qualities.
5:10
and – continues with second half of the command that arises from my now being “light in the Lord.” Because I am “light in the Lord,” (1) live as a child of light … and (2) find out…
find out – learn, explore, discover
what pleases – makes Him happy, brings pleasure, satisfies
the Lord – the Boss, Master
Ephesians 5:5-7
5:5
For – reason for preceding is found to follow
of this you can be sure – What follows is a fact, bet on it by building my life on it
No … person – leaves no room for an exception
immoral, impure or greedy – recalling list from verse 3
such a man is – present tense, current reality
an idolater – worships things, values creation over the creator
has any – not even a little bit
inheritance – receiving the benefits of someone’s estate; not counted as part of the family
in the kingdom – immoral, impure or greedy are not in the Kingdom. Sounds pretty straightforward; but I keep looking for and imagining loopholes.
of Christ and of God – same kingdom; only kingdom that counts because it is the only kingdom that lasts
5:6
Let no one deceive you [NLT: Don’t be fooled] – command, warning
deceive – mislead, blind to the facts, smooth-talk
with – by using
empty words – sound important but have no meaning or no value
for – cause, reason supporting the foregoing warning
because of – as a result, in consequence, in response to
such things – immoral, impure, greedy
God’s wrath – Dies irae; intense anger; fuming rage, but not out of control. God’s wrath is focused on the appropriate target(s).
comes – simple present; the context makes clear that Paul pictures a continuous process, response; as long as people practice (or have practiced or will practice) immoral, impure or greedy behavior, God’s wrath has, does and will come.
on those – on me, on us. I need to remember that Paul writes this warning to the believing fellowship, not to the idolatrous Ephesians. So today this warning still aims at me and others in the fellowship of believers. Granted, it gives us impetus to rescue our neighbors from God’s wrath. But the warning here is intended for me and we who are in the fellowship. This is a warning for me.
who are – present tense, continuous, at this point in time
disobedient – not following orders; intentionally violating instructions. It is an anomaly to picture followers of Christ who are disobedient. But that is the image here. So: At what point does an anomaly, when repeated in my life, cease to be an anomaly and instead become a pattern? If I disobey Him once a week or once a month, I can call that an anomaly. But how long does that pattern continue until it ceases to be an anomaly and becomes a habit or lifestyle? At some point, I cross over into the latter.
5:7
Therefore – because God’s wrath comes on the disobedient…
do not be – present tense, ongoing pattern
partners – participating together, investing with and reaping the same results from the investment
with them – i.e. the disobedient
For – reason for preceding is found to follow
of this you can be sure – What follows is a fact, bet on it by building my life on it
No … person – leaves no room for an exception
immoral, impure or greedy – recalling list from verse 3
such a man is – present tense, current reality
an idolater – worships things, values creation over the creator
has any – not even a little bit
inheritance – receiving the benefits of someone’s estate; not counted as part of the family
in the kingdom – immoral, impure or greedy are not in the Kingdom. Sounds pretty straightforward; but I keep looking for and imagining loopholes.
of Christ and of God – same kingdom; only kingdom that counts because it is the only kingdom that lasts
5:6
Let no one deceive you [NLT: Don’t be fooled] – command, warning
deceive – mislead, blind to the facts, smooth-talk
with – by using
empty words – sound important but have no meaning or no value
for – cause, reason supporting the foregoing warning
because of – as a result, in consequence, in response to
such things – immoral, impure, greedy
God’s wrath – Dies irae; intense anger; fuming rage, but not out of control. God’s wrath is focused on the appropriate target(s).
comes – simple present; the context makes clear that Paul pictures a continuous process, response; as long as people practice (or have practiced or will practice) immoral, impure or greedy behavior, God’s wrath has, does and will come.
on those – on me, on us. I need to remember that Paul writes this warning to the believing fellowship, not to the idolatrous Ephesians. So today this warning still aims at me and others in the fellowship of believers. Granted, it gives us impetus to rescue our neighbors from God’s wrath. But the warning here is intended for me and we who are in the fellowship. This is a warning for me.
who are – present tense, continuous, at this point in time
disobedient – not following orders; intentionally violating instructions. It is an anomaly to picture followers of Christ who are disobedient. But that is the image here. So: At what point does an anomaly, when repeated in my life, cease to be an anomaly and instead become a pattern? If I disobey Him once a week or once a month, I can call that an anomaly. But how long does that pattern continue until it ceases to be an anomaly and becomes a habit or lifestyle? At some point, I cross over into the latter.
5:7
Therefore – because God’s wrath comes on the disobedient…
do not be – present tense, ongoing pattern
partners – participating together, investing with and reaping the same results from the investment
with them – i.e. the disobedient
09 March 2010
Ephesians 5:3-4
5:3
But – contrast, this time between the self-sacrificing love seen in verses 1 – 2 as opposed to self-centered anti-love described below
among you – you/we who come together from very different backgrounds; we who have been made into one body out of those contrasting backgrounds; we who are a tertium quid — neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, neither American nor Mexican
there must not be – command, authority
even a hint – suggestion, tiniest possibility; it’s not enough to escape formal charges, I must not give any room or reason for speculation
of sexual immorality – is there another kind of immorality? In this computer age, it has become so easy to let the mind/eyes roam into the world of immorality. What harm is a fantasy? “If a man looks on a woman to lust after her, he has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
or – start of a short list
any kind – similar to “even a hint” above
of impurity – This could mean different things. First thought is to connect it with immorality. But that would leave “greed” (below) hanging disconnected. What else could impurity suggest? Dirty, soiled, trashy, unethical. Corporations or officials, caught doing something shameful, often reply, “We did not break any laws.” Perhaps that is true; but perhaps they violated ethical standards, took bribes or paid them, or took advantage of weaker people. Could that qualify as impurity, dirty, soiled, trashy, or unethical?
or of greed – materialism, worship of matter, finding significance or personal value in terms of financial figures and/or material possessions
The phrase “even a hint” applies to all three of these vices: immorality, impurity and greed.
because – the reason we in the body of Christ must not allow even a hint of these vices is found in the following…
these – umbrella terms for broad categories of offenses
are improper for – inappropriate, do not fit; do not go with, conflict with
God’s holy people – Holy god identifies with those He called; He calls them into a holy life, a life free from sin, characterized by victory over sin rather than continuous spiritual failure. Holy, victorious lifestyle cannot abide even a hint of these vices.
5:4
Nor – the list continues
should there be – previous 3 behaviors were tied to the imperative “must.” Here the phrase seems softer. Curious why this would be.
obscenity [NLT: obscene stories] – verbal filth; I still remember obscene stories from my childhood. I focus this application to verbal filth, because the rest of the series deals only with our speech. But the issue of obscenity in forms other than speech comes under the umbrella term in the previous verse, “any hint of sexual immorality.”
foolish talk – talking like a fool. How does a fool talk? He brags, boasts of accomplishments, most of which he never did. Finally, an activity that (I think) I score fairly well in, i.e., this is not me.
coarse joking – double entendres; much of what passes for sitcom humor involves statements with double meanings with sexual innuendo
which – these kinds of speech, language, conversations
are – present tense, ongoing reality
out of place – inappropriate; not fitting for a Christ-follower; these typify society at large; but they draw me away from Christ instead of closer to Him
but rather – emphatic contrast, replacing negative with the positive
thanksgiving – All of the foregoing negative speech can be replaced with thankful talk: Thanking God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; thanking my spouse, my parents, my siblings, my children; thanking others in our fellowship; thanking believers from other groups; thanking non-believers. Giving thanks: show appreciation, give recognition for good service
But – contrast, this time between the self-sacrificing love seen in verses 1 – 2 as opposed to self-centered anti-love described below
among you – you/we who come together from very different backgrounds; we who have been made into one body out of those contrasting backgrounds; we who are a tertium quid — neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, neither American nor Mexican
there must not be – command, authority
even a hint – suggestion, tiniest possibility; it’s not enough to escape formal charges, I must not give any room or reason for speculation
of sexual immorality – is there another kind of immorality? In this computer age, it has become so easy to let the mind/eyes roam into the world of immorality. What harm is a fantasy? “If a man looks on a woman to lust after her, he has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
or – start of a short list
any kind – similar to “even a hint” above
of impurity – This could mean different things. First thought is to connect it with immorality. But that would leave “greed” (below) hanging disconnected. What else could impurity suggest? Dirty, soiled, trashy, unethical. Corporations or officials, caught doing something shameful, often reply, “We did not break any laws.” Perhaps that is true; but perhaps they violated ethical standards, took bribes or paid them, or took advantage of weaker people. Could that qualify as impurity, dirty, soiled, trashy, or unethical?
or of greed – materialism, worship of matter, finding significance or personal value in terms of financial figures and/or material possessions
The phrase “even a hint” applies to all three of these vices: immorality, impurity and greed.
because – the reason we in the body of Christ must not allow even a hint of these vices is found in the following…
these – umbrella terms for broad categories of offenses
are improper for – inappropriate, do not fit; do not go with, conflict with
God’s holy people – Holy god identifies with those He called; He calls them into a holy life, a life free from sin, characterized by victory over sin rather than continuous spiritual failure. Holy, victorious lifestyle cannot abide even a hint of these vices.
5:4
Nor – the list continues
should there be – previous 3 behaviors were tied to the imperative “must.” Here the phrase seems softer. Curious why this would be.
obscenity [NLT: obscene stories] – verbal filth; I still remember obscene stories from my childhood. I focus this application to verbal filth, because the rest of the series deals only with our speech. But the issue of obscenity in forms other than speech comes under the umbrella term in the previous verse, “any hint of sexual immorality.”
foolish talk – talking like a fool. How does a fool talk? He brags, boasts of accomplishments, most of which he never did. Finally, an activity that (I think) I score fairly well in, i.e., this is not me.
coarse joking – double entendres; much of what passes for sitcom humor involves statements with double meanings with sexual innuendo
which – these kinds of speech, language, conversations
are – present tense, ongoing reality
out of place – inappropriate; not fitting for a Christ-follower; these typify society at large; but they draw me away from Christ instead of closer to Him
but rather – emphatic contrast, replacing negative with the positive
thanksgiving – All of the foregoing negative speech can be replaced with thankful talk: Thanking God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; thanking my spouse, my parents, my siblings, my children; thanking others in our fellowship; thanking believers from other groups; thanking non-believers. Giving thanks: show appreciation, give recognition for good service
Ephesians 5:1-2
5:1
… therefore … – the result or summary of the foregoing series of six commands is this:
Be imitators [NLT: Imitate] – another imperative command; copy, act like, follow the example of
of God – as before, I/we can never attain to this mark, but I feel called to aspire to this high calling and I think the calling is for all who claim the name of Christ
as – in the style of, or it could be: because [NLT] – since, as a result
dearly – high value, precious, close to the heart
loved – recipient of His beneficial acts, viz., atonement, grace, et al.
children – The fact that I have been adopted [as distinguished from biological entry] into God’s family does not diminish the fact that I am His child. But unlike human adoption, He has not only given me His name, He has also given me His nature. Now He calls me to implement, put into operation, that Christ-like nature He imparted to me. Then I will not only be His child through legal adoption, but also I will be His child in nature as I act, live as His child and thus demonstrate His attitude.
5:2
and – in addition, or in this context it could suggest evidencing the former by doing the latter
live a life – lifestyle, regular pattern of behavior
of – characterized by
love – actions, deeds, done on behalf of, for the benefit of others
just as – in the same manner as, in imitation of. Imitating (v. 1) the God who is love will manifest as copying His acts of love.
Christ – Messiah, God in the flesh, Emmanuel, God with us
loved – acted on our behalf, with our best interest in mind
us – while I was still a sinner, trapped in sin’s chains
and – God’s love was not marked by a warm, fuzzy feeling but rather by action, specifically...
gave – Philippians 2 tells me Christ not only gave, He also emptied. But this verse really goes even farther. Give: let go of, abandon any claim to; this is no longer mine; you can do with it whatever you choose
himself – Not just emptied, as incredible as that is. But more: let go of, abandoned all claims to his own person
[gave] up – i.e., offered up as a sacrificial offering
for – on behalf of, for the benefit of—thus an act of love
us – sinners, rebels, self-centered
as a – in the style of
fragrant – pleasant aroma
offering – “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” I’m picturing OT offerings, which were given for many different reasons. But when John the Baptizer called Jesus the “Lamb of God” he clarified that Jesus’ offering of His own person would function eternally in the role of a sin offering a la the OT, vicariously taking away the sin(s) of those who identify with the sin offering by faith.
and – in addition
sacrifice – killed in place of another; initially, at root, sacrifice means that it costs the giver, the giver experiences a loss when he gives it. But the faith concept woven into the OT sacrificial system evolved into the belief that the sacrifice—lamb, ram, goat, heifer, doves, et al., took the place of the designated beneficiary.
to God – God in Christ, God the Son, offered Himself to God the Father. Somehow this boils down to God sacrificing Himself to Himself on behalf of me—who neither knew Him nor cared about Him. “Amazing love! How can it be? That Thou my God shouldst die for me!”
… therefore … – the result or summary of the foregoing series of six commands is this:
Be imitators [NLT: Imitate] – another imperative command; copy, act like, follow the example of
of God – as before, I/we can never attain to this mark, but I feel called to aspire to this high calling and I think the calling is for all who claim the name of Christ
as – in the style of, or it could be: because [NLT] – since, as a result
dearly – high value, precious, close to the heart
loved – recipient of His beneficial acts, viz., atonement, grace, et al.
children – The fact that I have been adopted [as distinguished from biological entry] into God’s family does not diminish the fact that I am His child. But unlike human adoption, He has not only given me His name, He has also given me His nature. Now He calls me to implement, put into operation, that Christ-like nature He imparted to me. Then I will not only be His child through legal adoption, but also I will be His child in nature as I act, live as His child and thus demonstrate His attitude.
5:2
and – in addition, or in this context it could suggest evidencing the former by doing the latter
live a life – lifestyle, regular pattern of behavior
of – characterized by
love – actions, deeds, done on behalf of, for the benefit of others
just as – in the same manner as, in imitation of. Imitating (v. 1) the God who is love will manifest as copying His acts of love.
Christ – Messiah, God in the flesh, Emmanuel, God with us
loved – acted on our behalf, with our best interest in mind
us – while I was still a sinner, trapped in sin’s chains
and – God’s love was not marked by a warm, fuzzy feeling but rather by action, specifically...
gave – Philippians 2 tells me Christ not only gave, He also emptied. But this verse really goes even farther. Give: let go of, abandon any claim to; this is no longer mine; you can do with it whatever you choose
himself – Not just emptied, as incredible as that is. But more: let go of, abandoned all claims to his own person
[gave] up – i.e., offered up as a sacrificial offering
for – on behalf of, for the benefit of—thus an act of love
us – sinners, rebels, self-centered
as a – in the style of
fragrant – pleasant aroma
offering – “Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.” I’m picturing OT offerings, which were given for many different reasons. But when John the Baptizer called Jesus the “Lamb of God” he clarified that Jesus’ offering of His own person would function eternally in the role of a sin offering a la the OT, vicariously taking away the sin(s) of those who identify with the sin offering by faith.
and – in addition
sacrifice – killed in place of another; initially, at root, sacrifice means that it costs the giver, the giver experiences a loss when he gives it. But the faith concept woven into the OT sacrificial system evolved into the belief that the sacrifice—lamb, ram, goat, heifer, doves, et al., took the place of the designated beneficiary.
to God – God in Christ, God the Son, offered Himself to God the Father. Somehow this boils down to God sacrificing Himself to Himself on behalf of me—who neither knew Him nor cared about Him. “Amazing love! How can it be? That Thou my God shouldst die for me!”
06 March 2010
Ephesians 4:30-32
4:30
And do not – Fifth in the series of prohibition commands
grieve – sorrow, mourning, inward pain, weeping
the Holy Spirit of God – most elusive of the Trinity; Counselor, Comforter, Paracletos, Advocate; it is the Holy Spirit of God who lives inside me. When I pray and ask Jesus or the Lord or God to do this or that, it is the Holy Spirit of God who hears and translates this prayer into the request that I really intend to raise to God. And it is the Holy Spirit of God who achieves any answer to my prayer. He does not work for His own glory. His mission is to lift the name of Jesus and through Jesus to glorify the Father. One who is so committed to glorifying God the Father and God the Son: How can I bring Him sorrow?
NLT inserts: by the way you live – lifestyle, actions, habits, speech, all the patterns itemized in this list of prohibitions
with - This preposition refers to agency. The Holy Spirit of God was the active agent who achieved our being sealed. He sealed me, encloses me, protects me from intrusion. I am secure in Christ by the Holy Spirit.
whom – granted, the Greek does not distinguish between masculine and neuter genders. But this is a Person who acted and acts in us.
you – personally and collectively, me and us
were – past participle; occurred and completed in the past
sealed – marked for ownership. Not sealed as in walled off or sealed tightly shut and prevented from escape. But sealed as in branded to show ownership. I belong to God! The fact that God lives in me by His Holy Spirit proves that I belong to God! Any doubt or uncertain thoughts originate with the father of lies, the slanderer, the accuser.
for – until, in anticipation of, expecting, how long the guarantee lasts (is this the sense of the word? It seems so to me)
the day of redemption – We have been redeemed already. But this is the initial redemption. We still fall short of the glory of Christ. We still yearn to measure up to the full stature of Christ. We still have the hope that when we see Christ we shall be like Him for we will see Him as He is. That future day, when we see Him and are made like Him, is the final redemption of which this verse speaks.
God’s brand of ownership has been burned into my being. That brand guarantees that He will not leave me nor forsake me. It (the brand) is the sign or evidence that He (the Holy Spirit) guarantees to bring me to final redemption. On that day, I, with the billions of others He has thus branded, will see Christ as He is. On that day, we will be like Him. Incredible dream! But true.
4:31
Get rid of – Final prohibition command in the series of six. Remove, overcome, destroy
all – every trace, every hint of
bitterness – hostility, animosity, ill will, malice, hatred, spite, wishing evil toward those who injured me. Been there; done that; got the scars. Definition: intense antagonism or hatred
rage – Second of three synonymous terms: “Rage suggests loss of self-control,” i.e. in my expression of anger. Angry fury, violent anger; fury, indignation, ire, rampage, raving, tantrum, vehemence
and anger – Definition: “strong feeling of displeasure and belligerence aroused by a wrong;” “state of being mad, annoyed.” Animosity, antagonism, enmity, indignation, outrage, resentment
[Note, in case anyone else ever reads this: For the above 3 words, and probably the following as well, I checked and lifted from: thesaurus.reference.com and dictionary.reference.com.]
I find it curious that v. 26 says, “In your anger do not sin.” But this verse, 31, says to “get rid of all … anger.” The former suggests anger is okay to feel as long as I keep it under control and deal with it quickly. But the latter directly commands me to get rid of anger altogether. At this point, I have no resolution for this seeming discrepancy. And I have resolved not to resort to my commentaries for assistance in this exercise. I would love to have picked Paul’s brain about it. But alas! I must let it go for now.
brawling – definition: noisy quarrel, squabble or fight; synonym: altercation, dispute, scrap. I get the sense that this goes beyond a verbal disagreement to physical engagement.
and – don’t really see a connection between these two terms; perhaps the previous is physical engagement while the following is a verbal attack
slander – definition: “a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report;” synonym: backbiting, backstabbing, lie, misrepresentation, smear
along with – in addition to the foregoing five habits to remove …
every form – all expressions
of malice – definition: desire to inflict injury, harm, or suffering on another. Perhaps Paul is telling me that the previous five are possible expressions of malice. In that case, if I come up with any other ways to vent suffering on another, I must get rid of that intention or plan as well.
I certainly have gone through my years of bitterness. Those who lived with me then can attest to it. And I admit that I relished the thoughts of bad things happening to those who hurt me so deeply. Thank God, His grace finally brought me to the place when I could forgive and pray for their well-being. I still feel some ache and tenderness in that area of my memories. But those just serve to keep me hypersensitive to anyone who starts to say anything negative about another believer, especially one of our leaders.
I find it very interesting that Paul’s stern command regarding these malicious feelings and actions appears in the context of relations within the church, the body of Christ. Why do I get along better with some of my secular friends than I do with some of those in the body of Christ? Why have the people of God hurt me far more deeply, more often, and more intentionally than anyone in society at large has? Why has my struggle with bitterness focused exclusively on professing Christians? This is a fact: The only thing that has kept me part of any church is this: Jesus has always been faithful to me and this ill-behaving bride of his is the one He set His heart on to love. Ergo, I will be part of her, even though I see so little of Christ in her.
4:32
Be – NLT inserts “instead” to highlight the contrast between verses 31 and 32. Get rid of the negative, v. 31; replace it with the positive, v. 32
kind – “good and benevolent nature or disposition;” synonym: affectionate, generous, considerate, courteous, gracious, loving, thoughtful
and compassionate – “having or showing compassion” viz., “feeling of deep sympathy or sorrow for another who is stricken by misfortune, accompanied by a strong desire to alleviate the suffering.” [As in v. 31, definitions and synonyms from same sources]; synonym: empathy, sympathy, sorrow, tenderness, mercy
to one another – each other, back and forth, “he ain’t heavy; he’s my brother.” Why has the world sometimes done a better job of this than I have?
forgiving – accepting the pain of your attacks, loving you through those attacks and that pain, and not holding the offenses or pain against you
each other – and you doing the same for me, i.e., loving me also even through the pain I cause you
just as – in like manner, imitating
in Christ – all God’s mercies, forgiveness, grace and other blessings come to me in, by, through, and because of Christ
God forgave – took on Himself my sin(s); loved me through the sins and the pain it caused Him; and did not hold those offenses against me
You – me, each one who claims the name of Christ
And do not – Fifth in the series of prohibition commands
grieve – sorrow, mourning, inward pain, weeping
the Holy Spirit of God – most elusive of the Trinity; Counselor, Comforter, Paracletos, Advocate; it is the Holy Spirit of God who lives inside me. When I pray and ask Jesus or the Lord or God to do this or that, it is the Holy Spirit of God who hears and translates this prayer into the request that I really intend to raise to God. And it is the Holy Spirit of God who achieves any answer to my prayer. He does not work for His own glory. His mission is to lift the name of Jesus and through Jesus to glorify the Father. One who is so committed to glorifying God the Father and God the Son: How can I bring Him sorrow?
NLT inserts: by the way you live – lifestyle, actions, habits, speech, all the patterns itemized in this list of prohibitions
with - This preposition refers to agency. The Holy Spirit of God was the active agent who achieved our being sealed. He sealed me, encloses me, protects me from intrusion. I am secure in Christ by the Holy Spirit.
whom – granted, the Greek does not distinguish between masculine and neuter genders. But this is a Person who acted and acts in us.
you – personally and collectively, me and us
were – past participle; occurred and completed in the past
sealed – marked for ownership. Not sealed as in walled off or sealed tightly shut and prevented from escape. But sealed as in branded to show ownership. I belong to God! The fact that God lives in me by His Holy Spirit proves that I belong to God! Any doubt or uncertain thoughts originate with the father of lies, the slanderer, the accuser.
for – until, in anticipation of, expecting, how long the guarantee lasts (is this the sense of the word? It seems so to me)
the day of redemption – We have been redeemed already. But this is the initial redemption. We still fall short of the glory of Christ. We still yearn to measure up to the full stature of Christ. We still have the hope that when we see Christ we shall be like Him for we will see Him as He is. That future day, when we see Him and are made like Him, is the final redemption of which this verse speaks.
God’s brand of ownership has been burned into my being. That brand guarantees that He will not leave me nor forsake me. It (the brand) is the sign or evidence that He (the Holy Spirit) guarantees to bring me to final redemption. On that day, I, with the billions of others He has thus branded, will see Christ as He is. On that day, we will be like Him. Incredible dream! But true.
4:31
Get rid of – Final prohibition command in the series of six. Remove, overcome, destroy
all – every trace, every hint of
bitterness – hostility, animosity, ill will, malice, hatred, spite, wishing evil toward those who injured me. Been there; done that; got the scars. Definition: intense antagonism or hatred
rage – Second of three synonymous terms: “Rage suggests loss of self-control,” i.e. in my expression of anger. Angry fury, violent anger; fury, indignation, ire, rampage, raving, tantrum, vehemence
and anger – Definition: “strong feeling of displeasure and belligerence aroused by a wrong;” “state of being mad, annoyed.” Animosity, antagonism, enmity, indignation, outrage, resentment
[Note, in case anyone else ever reads this: For the above 3 words, and probably the following as well, I checked and lifted from: thesaurus.reference.com and dictionary.reference.com.]
I find it curious that v. 26 says, “In your anger do not sin.” But this verse, 31, says to “get rid of all … anger.” The former suggests anger is okay to feel as long as I keep it under control and deal with it quickly. But the latter directly commands me to get rid of anger altogether. At this point, I have no resolution for this seeming discrepancy. And I have resolved not to resort to my commentaries for assistance in this exercise. I would love to have picked Paul’s brain about it. But alas! I must let it go for now.
brawling – definition: noisy quarrel, squabble or fight; synonym: altercation, dispute, scrap. I get the sense that this goes beyond a verbal disagreement to physical engagement.
and – don’t really see a connection between these two terms; perhaps the previous is physical engagement while the following is a verbal attack
slander – definition: “a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report;” synonym: backbiting, backstabbing, lie, misrepresentation, smear
along with – in addition to the foregoing five habits to remove …
every form – all expressions
of malice – definition: desire to inflict injury, harm, or suffering on another. Perhaps Paul is telling me that the previous five are possible expressions of malice. In that case, if I come up with any other ways to vent suffering on another, I must get rid of that intention or plan as well.
I certainly have gone through my years of bitterness. Those who lived with me then can attest to it. And I admit that I relished the thoughts of bad things happening to those who hurt me so deeply. Thank God, His grace finally brought me to the place when I could forgive and pray for their well-being. I still feel some ache and tenderness in that area of my memories. But those just serve to keep me hypersensitive to anyone who starts to say anything negative about another believer, especially one of our leaders.
I find it very interesting that Paul’s stern command regarding these malicious feelings and actions appears in the context of relations within the church, the body of Christ. Why do I get along better with some of my secular friends than I do with some of those in the body of Christ? Why have the people of God hurt me far more deeply, more often, and more intentionally than anyone in society at large has? Why has my struggle with bitterness focused exclusively on professing Christians? This is a fact: The only thing that has kept me part of any church is this: Jesus has always been faithful to me and this ill-behaving bride of his is the one He set His heart on to love. Ergo, I will be part of her, even though I see so little of Christ in her.
4:32
Be – NLT inserts “instead” to highlight the contrast between verses 31 and 32. Get rid of the negative, v. 31; replace it with the positive, v. 32
kind – “good and benevolent nature or disposition;” synonym: affectionate, generous, considerate, courteous, gracious, loving, thoughtful
and compassionate – “having or showing compassion” viz., “feeling of deep sympathy or sorrow for another who is stricken by misfortune, accompanied by a strong desire to alleviate the suffering.” [As in v. 31, definitions and synonyms from same sources]; synonym: empathy, sympathy, sorrow, tenderness, mercy
to one another – each other, back and forth, “he ain’t heavy; he’s my brother.” Why has the world sometimes done a better job of this than I have?
forgiving – accepting the pain of your attacks, loving you through those attacks and that pain, and not holding the offenses or pain against you
each other – and you doing the same for me, i.e., loving me also even through the pain I cause you
just as – in like manner, imitating
in Christ – all God’s mercies, forgiveness, grace and other blessings come to me in, by, through, and because of Christ
God forgave – took on Himself my sin(s); loved me through the sins and the pain it caused Him; and did not hold those offenses against me
You – me, each one who claims the name of Christ
05 March 2010
Ephesians 4:28-29
4:28
He who – start of another admonition
has been – present participle; started in the past and continues to the present
stealing – taking what belongs to another—materially or otherwise
must – emphatic demand
steal no longer – change of lifestyle and habit
but – contrast
must – another demand, replacing negative with positive
work – get a job, contribute to society instead of leaching like a parasite
doing something useful – builds self-esteem and confidence
with his own hands – manual labor; keeps the hands and mind busy
that – in order to be able to…
he may have something – material gain
to share – instead of taking, he gives
with those in need – instead of thinking of self, actively showing concern for others
4:29
Do not let – Fourth in the series of 6 direct commands
any – not even one
unwholesome – unhealthy, unhelpful, destructive; NLT = foul or abusive: foul – offensive, suggestive, off-color; abusive – hurtful, derogatory, cutting
talk – speech, words, sounds
come out – escape
of your mouths – The tongue is the most difficult member to tame. Why is it then that my speech generally is well-tamed, but I cannot control other urges?
but – contrast; replace the negative with a positive
only – limitation, boundary, dog on a leash
what is helpful – needed, desired, refreshing
for building … up – edify, contribute to the others’ feeling, being and doing: better, stronger, more proficiently than previously. Enabling fellow-believers to grow more like Christ
others – this is brotherly-love, Christian love in action: to show concern for and give aid to others in the body of Christ
according to – as dictated by, guided by
their needs – not my needs but theirs. Lord, in our Home Bible Study Group, open my eyes and ears to sense their needs. Move my gaze, my attention, from self to others and their needs. I think You are doing this somewhat already. But I invite You to do it more.
that – in order that, with the goal of
it – my helpful speech
may benefit – bring good to, help, encourage, strengthen, soothe, calm, cheer—meet whatever need God reveals they have
those who listen – Many people have hurts that I am not called to address. But those in our Bible Study Group each week listen to me and discuss with me. As I listen, help me hear. Then as they listen, help them hear You and help me give a benefit. Correction: Please give a benefit through what and how I reply to them.
He who – start of another admonition
has been – present participle; started in the past and continues to the present
stealing – taking what belongs to another—materially or otherwise
must – emphatic demand
steal no longer – change of lifestyle and habit
but – contrast
must – another demand, replacing negative with positive
work – get a job, contribute to society instead of leaching like a parasite
doing something useful – builds self-esteem and confidence
with his own hands – manual labor; keeps the hands and mind busy
that – in order to be able to…
he may have something – material gain
to share – instead of taking, he gives
with those in need – instead of thinking of self, actively showing concern for others
4:29
Do not let – Fourth in the series of 6 direct commands
any – not even one
unwholesome – unhealthy, unhelpful, destructive; NLT = foul or abusive: foul – offensive, suggestive, off-color; abusive – hurtful, derogatory, cutting
talk – speech, words, sounds
come out – escape
of your mouths – The tongue is the most difficult member to tame. Why is it then that my speech generally is well-tamed, but I cannot control other urges?
but – contrast; replace the negative with a positive
only – limitation, boundary, dog on a leash
what is helpful – needed, desired, refreshing
for building … up – edify, contribute to the others’ feeling, being and doing: better, stronger, more proficiently than previously. Enabling fellow-believers to grow more like Christ
others – this is brotherly-love, Christian love in action: to show concern for and give aid to others in the body of Christ
according to – as dictated by, guided by
their needs – not my needs but theirs. Lord, in our Home Bible Study Group, open my eyes and ears to sense their needs. Move my gaze, my attention, from self to others and their needs. I think You are doing this somewhat already. But I invite You to do it more.
that – in order that, with the goal of
it – my helpful speech
may benefit – bring good to, help, encourage, strengthen, soothe, calm, cheer—meet whatever need God reveals they have
those who listen – Many people have hurts that I am not called to address. But those in our Bible Study Group each week listen to me and discuss with me. As I listen, help me hear. Then as they listen, help them hear You and help me give a benefit. Correction: Please give a benefit through what and how I reply to them.
04 March 2010
Ephesians 4:25-27
4:25
Therefore – as a result of how we learned Christ: as a result of putting off the old self, having a new mind/attitude, and putting on the new self…
each of you – I think he has generally been using plural pronouns and speaking to the believers collectively (did not research that). Now Paul stresses individual responsibility.
must – emphatic requirement
put off – get ride of, discard
falsehood – deception—either directly (lying) or indirectly (misleading)—Jacob pattern. This is so ingrained in me that only radical surgery can correct it. It is a cancer in my soul that requires excision.
and – the compliment to removing the negative involves replacing it with the positive
speak truthfully – plainly, straightforwardly, “let your ‘yes’ be ‘yes’ and your ‘no’ be ‘no’,” includes actions as well as words
to his neighbor – who is my neighbor? Person next to me, goes beyond brother or fellow-believer to include non-believers I meet, although the next phrase focuses on the body of Christ.
for – reason for the preceding comes next
we – believers, followers of Christ
are – present tense, current condition
all – without exception
members – belonging, committed to the group, what one does affects the group. Thus, I must speak truthfully even to non-believers, because a falsehood to them reflects on the body.
of one body – organic whole
4:26
“In your… – belongs to me/us
“…anger… – “strong feeling of displeasure aroused by a wrong” (dictionary.com); resentment
“…do not sin” – in action or attitude. My anger—justified as it seemed (was?)—grew into bitterness, which is sin. That spilled over into mistreatment of others, but I never expressed those feelings to those who had wronged me. Instead, innocent people around me, people who loved me, became my victims.
Do not – command
let the sun go down – day’s end
while you are still angry – resolve the issue quickly; don’t take it to bed
4:27
and – further exposition of the quote
do not – command
give – concede, yield, surrender
the devil – opponent, “slanderer;”
a foothold – he will (and does) haunt me with memories of how my anger cum bitterness has produced sin and failure to God and people; this gives a foothold
Therefore – as a result of how we learned Christ: as a result of putting off the old self, having a new mind/attitude, and putting on the new self…
each of you – I think he has generally been using plural pronouns and speaking to the believers collectively (did not research that). Now Paul stresses individual responsibility.
must – emphatic requirement
put off – get ride of, discard
falsehood – deception—either directly (lying) or indirectly (misleading)—Jacob pattern. This is so ingrained in me that only radical surgery can correct it. It is a cancer in my soul that requires excision.
and – the compliment to removing the negative involves replacing it with the positive
speak truthfully – plainly, straightforwardly, “let your ‘yes’ be ‘yes’ and your ‘no’ be ‘no’,” includes actions as well as words
to his neighbor – who is my neighbor? Person next to me, goes beyond brother or fellow-believer to include non-believers I meet, although the next phrase focuses on the body of Christ.
for – reason for the preceding comes next
we – believers, followers of Christ
are – present tense, current condition
all – without exception
members – belonging, committed to the group, what one does affects the group. Thus, I must speak truthfully even to non-believers, because a falsehood to them reflects on the body.
of one body – organic whole
4:26
“In your… – belongs to me/us
“…anger… – “strong feeling of displeasure aroused by a wrong” (dictionary.com); resentment
“…do not sin” – in action or attitude. My anger—justified as it seemed (was?)—grew into bitterness, which is sin. That spilled over into mistreatment of others, but I never expressed those feelings to those who had wronged me. Instead, innocent people around me, people who loved me, became my victims.
Do not – command
let the sun go down – day’s end
while you are still angry – resolve the issue quickly; don’t take it to bed
4:27
and – further exposition of the quote
do not – command
give – concede, yield, surrender
the devil – opponent, “slanderer;”
a foothold – he will (and does) haunt me with memories of how my anger cum bitterness has produced sin and failure to God and people; this gives a foothold
Ephesians 4:23-24
4:23
to be made new – passive voice; renewal done to me not BY me. NLT = “let the Spirit renew…” This clarifies that it is the Holy Spirit who effects this renewal.
in the attitude – outlook, spirit, disposition, mood, temperament, point of view
of your mind – Rom. 12:2, “be transformed by the renewing of your mind.” Think like Christ instead of society; then let my Christ-like thinking guide, direct, instruct my outlook or mood. I don’t have to be a victim of my moods.
4:24
and – Third thing we were taught with regard to our former way of life (v. 22)
to put on – discarded old self; now “put on” its replacement. Getting dressed in, intentional course of action, does not happen automatically. I’m tired of going around in these grubby clothes; I’m going to clean up and wear some nice things instead. “Handsome is as handsome does.”
the new self – difference, change, improvement; in the context, this different person is called to be made in the image of Christ, fashioned after the way I was taught
created – Whoa! Didn’t see that coming. I was thinking reformation, improvement, work on some defective parts. But “created” suggests starting from scratch, completely new from head to foot, not simply changed but replaced at the core of my being and from that new core, replacing every part of who I am.
to be – for the purpose
like God – Why do we keep referring to ourselves as sinners when God through Christ has created (re-created) us to be like God? Is God a sinner? No! Then why do we characterize ourselves this way? Somehow I have to span this dialectic: That on the one hand, I fall short of being like God and will never fully attain that ideal while on the other hand, God continually calls me and graces me to aspire and move in the direction of God-likeness. I've been thinking lately of some men I know who go on church-related men's retreats. While there they participate in some activities that seem to me to skirt the edge of worldly activities. I try not to judge them. Knowing one of the leaders, I trust their motives. But this thought has recurred to me a number of times: Why do Christians seem to explore how much like the world they can become and still call themselves "Christians"? Instead, we should endeavor to become as much like Christ as we can and still keep contact with the world.
in true – not self-righteousness, which is self-created, self-imposed and self-measured, but true: real, genuine, authentic, created and measured by God
righteousness – being and doing what is right, just, correct in the sight of God
and holiness – victory over sin. God’s holiness is essential to His character: Complete absence of sin, past, present or future. Too late for me to have that. True God-like holiness: live with singular motive of doing only God’s will.
to be made new – passive voice; renewal done to me not BY me. NLT = “let the Spirit renew…” This clarifies that it is the Holy Spirit who effects this renewal.
in the attitude – outlook, spirit, disposition, mood, temperament, point of view
of your mind – Rom. 12:2, “be transformed by the renewing of your mind.” Think like Christ instead of society; then let my Christ-like thinking guide, direct, instruct my outlook or mood. I don’t have to be a victim of my moods.
4:24
and – Third thing we were taught with regard to our former way of life (v. 22)
to put on – discarded old self; now “put on” its replacement. Getting dressed in, intentional course of action, does not happen automatically. I’m tired of going around in these grubby clothes; I’m going to clean up and wear some nice things instead. “Handsome is as handsome does.”
the new self – difference, change, improvement; in the context, this different person is called to be made in the image of Christ, fashioned after the way I was taught
created – Whoa! Didn’t see that coming. I was thinking reformation, improvement, work on some defective parts. But “created” suggests starting from scratch, completely new from head to foot, not simply changed but replaced at the core of my being and from that new core, replacing every part of who I am.
to be – for the purpose
like God – Why do we keep referring to ourselves as sinners when God through Christ has created (re-created) us to be like God? Is God a sinner? No! Then why do we characterize ourselves this way? Somehow I have to span this dialectic: That on the one hand, I fall short of being like God and will never fully attain that ideal while on the other hand, God continually calls me and graces me to aspire and move in the direction of God-likeness. I've been thinking lately of some men I know who go on church-related men's retreats. While there they participate in some activities that seem to me to skirt the edge of worldly activities. I try not to judge them. Knowing one of the leaders, I trust their motives. But this thought has recurred to me a number of times: Why do Christians seem to explore how much like the world they can become and still call themselves "Christians"? Instead, we should endeavor to become as much like Christ as we can and still keep contact with the world.
in true – not self-righteousness, which is self-created, self-imposed and self-measured, but true: real, genuine, authentic, created and measured by God
righteousness – being and doing what is right, just, correct in the sight of God
and holiness – victory over sin. God’s holiness is essential to His character: Complete absence of sin, past, present or future. Too late for me to have that. True God-like holiness: live with singular motive of doing only God’s will.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)