28 May 2007
"Best" Christian?
Immediately, danger bells went off in my mind. This is a terrible thing to say to anyone. I'm trying to keep track of all the ways in which it causes problems.
For one thing, it is not true. First off, I know the many and frequent ways in which I fail the Lord. I know the areas in which I struggle. Sometimes the struggle turns out honoring the Lord. But too often I fail him. Only God could count the number of times I have cried before him in repentance--and I think he does not keep count of those occasions. Only God could count the number of times I have asked for his help during a struggle, only to turn from that help and try to fight the battle in my own strength. Does this describe a "best" Christian? No. In addition, how can any person determine if one believer is a "better" Christian than any other? Doesn't it all depend on God's grace through faith? Yes. If that is so, then only God knows who among a given fellowship is depending on God's grace through faith and who is acting in his own human efforts.
Another danger: The person who said this is looking on exterior evidences. He does not know the hearts of the others in the fellowship. Only God knows that information and He's not telling us. But I think it may suggest that the person who said this sees himself as not measuring up in some way. In what way that may be I do not know and do not need to know. But if he is trusting God's grace through faith, then what makes him less of a Christian than I?
But perhaps the greater danger is this: It tempts me to think I have somehow "arrived"--that I am really the Christian God wants me to be. And I know that is not the case. But the temptation is a terrible thing. It raises the specter of pride. It tempts me to think I am ready to show all the others in our fellowship how to be a Christian.
Fortunately, I felt immediately on guard against such possibilities. I know I am not the best Christian in our fellowship. More accurately: I know that it is not even a question I should ask. The question should be: "Am I the best Christian I can be at this point in my pilgrimage?" Still, I think the answer is no. But God is working on me in this area. Increasingly, He helps me focus on the goal of being like Christ instead of being better than I was or better than someone else.
But at the same time, God helped me sense the spirit of the person who said this to me. He meant to convey his appreciation for my service to the Lord. So, I just smiled expressed my doubt about the accuracy of his statement and then I thanked him.
Should I have responded differently? I don't know. What do you think?
27 May 2007
Comfort Zones
Now, I should clarify that Pastor is very supportive of my work for the persecuted church. But the plan I proposed was something that pushed the limits a bit. It was different from how our fellowship usually does their prayer time. The details of my proposal are not needed for what I want to say here. Rather, I want to talk about his response and what God taught me through his response.
As I explained what I had in mind, I started to sense that he did not feel comfortable with what I proposed. So I checked on that. I said, "I think I sense that you are not comfortable with that idea."
He confirmed my suspicion and then said, "I don't think our people are mature enough for that yet."
Now I could go off on the issue of how long do we allow our people to remain immature. But that is not what God said to me at the time. Instead, I sensed God revealing to me that I needed to have more of the sensitivity that my pastor has. I needed (when I was pastoring) and certainly still need now (as I visit churches as a guest speaker) to be more sensitive to where the congregation is in their growth in Christ.
In the past when I was pastoring, I would get some exciting new idea in my head. I was certain it came from God (I still think that I was right--some of those times). So I would push ahead and convince the church board to follow through on this great new plan. I'm thinking of a couple situations in particular. We had a growing congregation and we needed to figure out how to accommodate the number of people that were coming to our fellowship. We simply did not have room for them all. So I proposed a plan that would allow the number of people to continue to increase. But the congregation was not ready for it. And the backlash has had lasting effects in my life.
I still don't know how I could/should have handled it differently. The growth was so rapid that we needed to do something quickly. But I should have worked with the leadership of the fellowship on a one-to-one basis before bringing the proposal to the whole church board. Instead, I just put the idea out there and expected them to go along with it. Well, they did for a while. But then the backlash hit. And I have reeled in reaction ever since.
This past Friday, in Pastor's brief response, I realized that the heart of a pastor involves a deep sensitivity to where the congregation is in their journey of growing into the likeness of Christ. I don't expect God will ever have me in a pastoral position again. But I do find myself increasingly speaking as a guest speaker for various churches. And I need to adopt my pastor's perspective in working with these various fellowships.
Thank you pastor for being sensitive to our fellowship's strengths and weaknesses.
23 May 2007
Fire (C) by Eddie Francisco
© by
Eddie Francisco
White-hot fire in my night.
I dare not approach.
Searing flame consumes,
Cleanses, refines.
I cannot survive such purity.
Then nail-pierced hands emerge,
Flesh—soft but scarred.
Cradled in his embrace,
When I cannot come to him,
He enfolds with dove-like arms.
21 May 2007
Grace
Meanwhile, in some of research for another project, I came across claims from other religions that their god(s) give grace. So what's the difference?
A few years ago when I worked at the mortuary, I assisted a Buddhist family when their father died. Part of their ceremony involved burning money. So I set up a barbeque outdoors so they could conduct this portion of their event. While the (play) money was burning, I conversed with the eldest son as he put thousands and thousands of (play) dollars in the fire. He explained that the more completely the money burns and the more money he puts on the fire will determine how much grace god will give his father in his migration to the next life. I ignored the thought that my understanding is that Buddhism does not actually acknowledge the existence of God/god. Instead I politely listened to the son's explanation of how to get grace from their god.
In the years since, I have revisted this scene many times. And I keep wondering what is the difference between the grace we say our God gives us and the grace they hope to get from their god? If there is no difference, then why go to all the bother to try to convert a Buddhist (or a practitioner of any other religion) from their ways to ours? If both God and god give the same grace, what benefit is there?
On the other hand, if grace is more than simply "the unmerited favor of God" then maybe there is a benefit--an advantage--to following Christ.
Sooooo, is there something more to "grace" as the Bible presents it? Is it more than just "the unmerited favor of God"? Please don't quote Calvin, or any other theologian, to me on this topic. They just keep coming back to "the unmerited favor of God." If I can get that from any other religion, then why follow Christ? Why take up my cross, if I can get grace somewhere else simply by burning play money?
What to do?
But yesterday, I accidentally happened upon another thing that needs to be done and is not being done very well at this point. And I found myself enjoying it and felt energized by it.
What to do?
17 May 2007
Single Mothers
Bible Study, Dt 32:39-42
Today I noticed the verses in Dt. 32:39-42. God has been talking about the Israelites in the Song of Moses. And he forsees when they will abandon him and serve other gods. Those other rocks in which they will seek safety are "not like our Rock" (verse 31).
Suddenly in verse 39, God focuses on himself. 19 times in the space of 4 verses, God uses the first person pronoun (I or me or my). 19 times! One of the things that impresses me about this is: God has the notion that the universe revolves around him!
Now, I've known more than a few people who thought the world revolved around them. They expected others to serve them, to please them, to keep them happy. I've seen them act as if others were to wait on them hand and foot. In fact, I've been accused of that attitude a few times myself. (I think I'm growing out of that phase.)
But these verses in Deuteronomy remind me that God--YHWH, The Great I AM--is the only one who rightfully holds the position of the focus of all the universe and all history. The heavenly beings fly around his throne, singing
16 May 2007
Basketball!
Before I get going, let me clarify for anyone who reads this and doesn't know it already (those who know me already know the following). It will be obvious to most readers that I know very little about bball. I am vertically challenged; so I don't play the game. And I only watch during the playoffs. Still, I have my favorites and I watch the games devotedly.
I used to be a big fan of the Spurs. I thought highly of David Robinson (when he was active) and Tim Duncan. In fact, I still respect them. But they should not hang around such players as now populate the Spurs team.
I'm thinking first of the cheap "groin shot" that Bowen threw at Steve Nash. Never mind that the ref was standing right there and failed to call a foul. What I saw was Bowen deliberately turned and kneed Nash in the groin (pc term for "in the crotch"). It appeared to be an intentional attempt to disable the Suns key player. Didn't work.
I might have let that pass. But then Monday night Horry body-slammed Nash near the end of the game. True, this was the phase of the game when common strategy calls for the losing team (in this case the Spurs) to intentionally foul the ball handler. But all Horry needed to do was hold Nash. Or he could have pushed him a little bit. But a body block--as everyone agrees--was totally uncalled for. I used to respect Robert Horry. No more. He used to be called Robert "Big Shot" Horry, for his penchant to hit the big shot when the game was on the line. Now he will be called Robert "Cheap Shot" Horry, because he lost his cool when the game was on the line.
Was it a coincidence that both attacks were aimed at the Suns' team leader, Steve Nash? I think it was intentional. Which leads me to switch my loyalties completely.
I've rooted for San Antonio in the past. No more. I'm sure this will not bother them in the least. They don't need (and apparently don't want) my support. But I think I'm not the only person of this position. We have cheered the Spurs in the past. But if they can't clean up their act, they will end up losing a lot more than our respect.
15 May 2007
Christians and restaurants
Then, as if throwing mud on the face of Jesus, when the food is served, these same critical people bow their heads and pray! If you're going to act in such an un-Christlike manner, at least do not pray. Maybe the staff will think you just came from a concert and Jesus will not be insulted by your critical attitude.
Finally, when paying the bill, do NOT be stingy with the tip. 15% should be the minimum. As I said before, the staff knows you just came from church. They associate what you do with what Jesus is like. If you are stingy with your money, they connect that stinginess with Jesus. But we know that Jesus has given us all the riches of heaven. Shouldn't we share that generosity with others? Many of the wait-staff are single moms and/or students. They depend on the tips to make ends meet. A non-believer will go into that same restaurant, be kind to the staff and leave a generous tip. At the same time, a believer will enter. He/she (the believer) will be judged by the same standards. The waitperson will measure these factors: "Did he treat me kindly, like a person? Did he tip me well?" Yes, it will cost us a dollar or 2 or 3 more to show this generosity.
Whether we frequent the same restaurant every week or it is a one-time visit, we are making a witness for Christ. And we want to earn the right--for ourselves or for another believer--to share the love of Christ with those her serve.
What do you think?
11 May 2007
Immigrants
It seems to me that I see an unusually high percentage of student employees from non-anglo background. Depending on the community or neighborhood, these student workers may be East Indian, Hispanic, East Asian, Eastern European, or who knows. The point is that they moved here with their families at some point when the student was probably very young. Basically they grew up here and are basically bi-lingual. With that skill edge, they get an after school job. The young man at the pizzeria gets out of school at 3:10 and starts to work at 3:30.
I've heard various people complain at this point. I've received emails that criticize how the immigrants are taking our jobs and taking over our country. I heard a minister complain and criticize that the clerk at a fast food place did not speak clear English (I almost walked out on his sermon).
As I see it: These are the same complaints we've heard every time there was a wave of immigrants. When the Irish came, my ancestors (and maybe yours) complained that they didn't speak English right. When the Germans came, my ancestors (and maybe yours) complained that they didn't speak English at all. Same with the Italians and the Chinese and Japanese and whatever group came in a wave. My ancestors (and maybe yours) complained that these new immigrants were taking all the jobs because they were willing to work for less money. My ancestors (and maybe yours) feared that pretty soon we would all be speaking Irish or German or Italian or Chinese or whatever language was the fear of the day.
None of those fears came true. Instead, what happened?
Within 1 generation--2 at the most--those immigrants' children knew the language, maybe better than children whose great-grandparents came here. In 1 or 2 generations, these immigrant descendants had jobs or had businesses and employed other people. And why was this the case? Because they came with a work ethic that expected--virtually required--their children to get a job and contribute to the family budget. As a result, those children grew up expecting that they would work for what they needed. They grew up NOT expecting special handouts from the government. As a result, they became leaders in their community and even in the nation. (Do I really need to give a list of immigrant children/grandchildren who went on to national prominence?)
That brings me back to the young man at the pizzeria: I expect that in a few years he will have his own business and employ others. He certainly will support his own way and that of others. He will live his life as a responsible member of society. And our country will benefit from his participation.
He is not the exception. He is the norm. We hear about the exceptions on the evening news. That is why they make the news: Because they are not the norm. They cause trouble and we don't want them. But the vast majority of immigrants contribute positively to our society. The children will give more. And their grandchildren may well be community leaders.
Thank you for coming to the United States. We are glad you are here.
09 May 2007
Unabashed plug
Or you can go to this web site: http://www.global-prayer-digest.org/ to see the current month's issue on-line. I've got an interesting article coming up on the 22nd that caught the editor's eye enough to give it a front cover blurb! So that's kinda neat too.
Hope you'll read it. Then give me you're feedback.
Hasta....
08 May 2007
Bible Study, Dt. 26:7
I realize that some fluxuation of emotions is normal. Everyone experiences it. I don't think that's what I'm experiencing. It seems sometimes like a light-switch suddenly turns OFF. And inside, everything goes dark. Emotionally I suddenly feel like I'm in a fog out at sea without a clue of how to get back to shore.
Well, all of that was kind of a prelude to the verse I highlighted in my Bible study this morning. Deuteronomy 26:7, "We cried out to the Lord, the God of our fathers, and the Lord heard our voice and saw our misery, toil and oppression."
Well, I don't need or want the fame. But I wish/pray that God would set me as a source of praise, fame and honor for Him.
05 May 2007
The Difference
Al primero: Feliz cinco de mayo a todos!
Okay, today I'm wondering about the difference. And while I have given this considerable thought, I really have not organized those thoughts. So I'm not sure how this is going to come out.
I've been wondering about the difference between a follower of Jesus and a person who does not follow Christ. Followers of Christ basically accept that we are brought into his family on the basis of his work on the cross and our faith in him--through grace. As Paul says, "Not by works, so that we cannot boast." The flip side of that tenet is: Nothing I do can separate me from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Now, I'm not saying that this latter statement holds true in the Bible. Rather, it seems that it has gained popularity in the North American church. As a result, we have people who claim the blessing of God in spite of lifestyles that clearly violate the teachings of the Bible and specifically the example and teachings of Christ Jesus whom they claim as Lord. For example: committing adultery on Saturday evening and praising God on Sunday morning.
I know the inner turmoil of failing God on Friday or Saturday night (not adultery but in other ways) and then coming to worship him--even preaching--on Sunday morning. And I know God forgives me and has already paid the price for my sin. So, yes, I am accepted as a child of God based on the completed work of Christ.
But when/where do we draw the line? When/where do we say this can no longer be tolerated? Haven't we who claim to follow Christ become so much like the rest of the world that no one can see any difference?
When I was a child, the difference between "Christians" and "sinners" was obvious: Sinners did certain things (various lists existed) and Christians did not do those things. Clearly, that was legalistic and wrong. In the decades since, those lists of do's and don't's have gone by the wayside--and rightly so.
But what has replaced them? Have we cultivated any new lists of do's and don't's for followers of Christ--any new distinctions? For example, how about a list like this:
DO:
Followers of Christ respect all people and honor each person's uniqueness.
Followers of Christ forgive offenses and seek reconciliation.
Followers of Christ seek justice for the oppressed.
Etc....
DON'T:
Followers of Christ do not try to force non-believers to live by our standards.
Followers of Christ do not nurse our hurts and bitterness.
Followers of Christ do not enslave others or take advantage of employees.
Etc....
You can develop your own list. But perhaps these brief suggestions point the way for a new kind of distinction between followers of Christ and everyone else. In the current situation--as I see it--many who do not claim any allegiance to Christ seem to emulate his life and teachings better than many of us who call him Lord. At the same time, many of us who claim to follow Christ act more like non-believers than the non-believers do.
How sad. I carry the weight of responsibility for this. May God have mercy on us who call Jesus "Master".
What do you think?
04 May 2007
Iraq
A couple times every day I drive by a sign in our town that says "3,800 deaths in Iraq...What for?" The implication I get from that sign is that Iraq is not worth that many US deaths.
Well, I just want to apply that same principle to a some other scenarios:
In the D-Day invasion, June 6-20, 1944--in those 2 weeks alone--the US armed forces lost 3,082 killed in action. The total for US, UK and Canadian forces was 5,287, plus those from other participating countries. This does not consider the thousands of other deaths in the European Theatre. Was Europe worth those deaths?
On Iwo Jima, a tiny speck of an island--hardly worth anything--allied forces sacrifices "nearly 50,000" men to gain this foothold in the larger Pacific Theatre of WWII. Was Iwo Jima worth it?
In the Korean War, allied forces lost over 54,000 men to gain nothing. We simply returned the boundary between North and South Korea to the same place it was before the war. Was Korea worth it?
I feel as frustrated as most Americans with how the conflict in Iraq is moving. But if we as Americans are at all concerned with the well being of other nations, I believe that Iraq is at least as deserving of our investment as these other areas of conflict. To justify the deaths in Europe, Japan and Korea as deserving and then to suggest the deaths in Iraq are undeserved boils down to this: prejudice. It means that Arabs/Iraqis/Muslims are worth less than these other ethnic groups. I believe a stable government in Iraq is as worthy a goal as stability in Europe, Japan and Korea.
What do you think?

